INDEX 



445 



introducing into Apologetics, 238 ; 

 weakness of, as resting at last on 

 human testimony and judgment, 

 239 seq., and as presupposing Na- 

 ture to depend on -will of God, 240. 



Moleschott, among materialists, 122. 



Monism, true meaning of, 410; not 

 the theory that but one kind of 

 Substance exists, 410 ; fundamental 

 issue between, and pluralism, 411. 



Monotheism, pluralistic idealism 

 proved tlie only genuine, 362-372. 



Monotheistic character of Personal 

 Idealism vindicated against Mr. 

 McTaggart's objections, 428 seq. ; 

 its right in using name God, 429- 



430- 



Montgomery, Dr. E., in Concord 

 " symposium " on pantheism, 56 

 note. 



Morality, in strict sense, impossible 

 without real freedom, xx.xvii, 329, 

 333, 351 ; hence involves coeternity 

 ot souls with God, 351 seq., cf. 338, 

 342, 343 ; its first principle an act 

 of knoTi'ledge , as well as first prin- 

 ciple thereof, x.xxvii, 400 seq. 



Natural Selection. [See Selection, 

 Natural.'] 



Nature, in essence, sum of organised 

 experiences of minds, xii-xiii ; joint 

 explanation of, by Efficient and by 

 Final Causation, xx-xxi ; not prop- 

 erly a cause, but only a transmis- 

 sive effect or aggregate of such 

 effects, 39; its origin in the com- 

 plete self-definition of the individ- 

 ual, 306 seq., 362 seq.; factor in 

 every mind other than God, 362- 

 365 ; scene of ceaseless conflict be- 

 tween actual and ideal, 364, 366; 

 not in itself guilt, but carries risk of 

 sin, 367 seq. 



Necessity, as nexus of phenomena, 

 issuesfrom individual minds, 41-45. 



Neo-Hegelianism, its dubious rela- 

 tion to Darwinian theory, 4. 



Neo-Kantianisni, its singular reversal 

 of apriorism, 102; German school 



of, prominent members in, 103 

 note. 

 Noumenon, distinguished from phe- 

 nomenon, 13 seq.; the human per- 

 son not a, if evolutional philoso- 

 phy holds, 14, 43, 52 ; possibility of 

 knowing the, 15, 17, 24 seq., 168 

 seq. ; if knowable, must be Reason, 

 15, 170, 174 seq. ; reality of, neces- 

 sary to evolution, 22, 29 ; every real 

 mind must be a, xvi, 41, 44, 45, 333, 

 33S seq. ; interpreted as nit^re 710- 

 tion, and limitingnonon, by Lange, 

 149, 160, 162 ; belief in, as real, held 

 organic illusion by same, 150, 163- 

 166, but in fact has source in each 

 mind's primal consciousness of 

 others, 174 seq. ; final explanation 

 of, 175. 



Objectivity, problem of its nature and 

 basis, xxxiii ; new theory of, char- 

 acterising Personal Idealism, xxxiii 

 seq., 173-175, 310-312, 351-354, 359, 

 384, 400 seq., 417 seq.; dilemmas 

 over, in course of modern thought, 

 xvxiii-xxxv, and their solution by 

 Personal Idealism, xxxvi. 



Oken, among undoubted pantheists, 



63- 

 Omar Khayyam. [See FitzGerald.] 

 Ontological Proof of God, historic 

 employers of, 356; impugned by 

 Kant, 356; not rehabilitated by 

 Hegel, 356 ; formalised by Anselm, 

 358 ; improved by Descartes, 358 ; 

 how related to proof by Personal 

 Idealism, 359, cf. 356 seq. 



Pantheism, common confusion as to 

 its meaning, 58 ; distinguished from 

 theism and deism, 58, 69, 76; defi- 

 nition of, 62, 76; two forms of, 

 Atheistic and Acosmic, 62, both at 

 bottom atheisms, 64; relations of 

 chief philosophic systems to, 63, cf. 

 note; relation of, to materialism 

 and to subjective idcalisin, 65-68 ; 

 thcistic gains in, 68, 69; merit of, 

 in comparison with deism, 69, and 



