448 



INDEX 



harmony with, 219-224 ; two meth- 

 ods with, — Method of Authority, 

 Method of Reason, 226; this 

 divergence about, not to be con- 

 founded with Romanism vs. Pro- 

 testantism, nor with Chiistianity z/j. 

 Infidehty, etc., 226-230; Method 

 of Authority fails in, (i) because 

 self-contradictory, 230 seq., (2) be- 

 cause unable to verify directly pres- 

 ent God, 233 seq., (3) because at 

 war with essential spirit of Chris- 

 tianity, 241 seq., 259 seq. ; essence 

 of Christian, or " secret of Jesus," 

 243-258 ; doctrine of Christian, 

 foreshadowed in Hellenic thought, 

 but its tone and temper not reached, 

 244; Christian insight in, failed of 

 also by Judaism, 252 seq.; con- 

 tents of, must be determined by 

 reason, 261, as Method of Author- 

 ity itself tacitly implies, 263, and 

 ever-increasing reliance on Inter- 

 nal Evidence shows, 264 seq. ; his- 

 torical development of, shows man- 

 ifest and constant growtli in using 

 Method of Reason, 266; broadest 

 and deepest definitions of, 267, 

 268 ; common fallacy in arguments 

 for, on basis of evolution, 270-272; 

 highest form of, presupposed in 

 tacit logic of scientific method, 

 273-277. [See Reason, and Love.'] 



Responsibility, individual, disappears 

 by logic of evolutional philosophy, 

 7, 51 ; requires an eternal Pluralism, 

 328 seq., 337 seq., 342 seq., 399. 



Reviewers, errors and oversights of, 

 in dealing with Personal Idealism, 

 xxxii-.xlviii, 409-430; owing, in 

 part, to absence from present book 

 of sufficient discussion of Space, 

 .\.\xviii-xl, 418. 



Rothe, on pantheistic mysticism, 65 

 note. 



Royce, Prof. J., on uncertainty of 

 immortality, 43, note i; admits, in 

 effect, opposition of Cosmic The- 

 ism to strict freedom of individual, 

 43, note 2 ; charges pluralistic ideal- 



ism with atheism or else polythe- 

 ism, 349. 

 Ruskin, on criterion of "greatest 

 artist," 201. 



Salvation, real meaning of, 315 ; ulti- 

 mately universal, 315, 373 seq., 375- 

 377 ; indwelling source of, 379, 380. 



Schelling, takes, with Fichte, mo- 

 nistic alternative in the dilemma 

 brought on by Kant, xxxv, and gets 

 into deeper one, xxxvi ; among un- 

 doubted pantheists, 63 ; his"iVi?«- 

 trum" as bearing on Hartmann's 

 " Unconscious," 113; his theory of 

 art, germ of Le Conte's, 187 ; his 

 title " esemplastic," for fine arts, 

 205, 215. 



Schiller, poet, on art theory, influ- 

 ences Le Conte, 187 ; on art as 

 man's prerogative, 199. 



Schiller, F. C. S., his special form of 

 pluralism, universal finitude, xii. 



Schopenhauer, his wide sphere in 

 later Germany, 105 ; his influence 

 upon Hartmann, 105, 106; his doc- 

 trine of Thing-in-itself as Will, 107 ; 

 his pessimism, 107, 108 ; sum of his 

 ethics, 108 ; his atheistic religion, 

 108 ; his service to philosophy, 121, 



Science, Natural, and its world, mat- 

 ter of sheer belief, when World of 

 Minds becomes so, xxxv; cannot 

 settle question of limits in evolu- 

 tion, 9-12; evidence of, comes 

 short of widest universals, 9, 11 ; 

 method of, as viewed by philoso- 

 phy, 34, 35 ; cannot explain human 

 nature, 49, 54 ; within its own lim- 

 its, completely compatible with re- 

 ligion, 54; method of, as naturally 

 construed by its practitioners, 83- 

 85; seeming pantheistic drift of, 

 (i) through its method, 85 seq., 

 (2) through its chief results, 87- 

 93; "modern," restricted to ex- 

 periential science of Nature, 94; 

 cannot solve problem of limits of 

 knowledge, 96 ; outside its own 

 limits, entirely neutral, 97 ; its real 



