a. 



2-5 1 



I 

 i 2 



L 

 I 



: 1-5 

 ; 1 



2^ 



a I 



BEN+GA 



IB baited 

 D unbajted 



BC BC 



BC 



a. 



0.5 



pyramid cylinder 



LIM+GA 



Circle 



e baited 

 D unbailed 



pyramid 



cylinder 



Circle 



AB AB 



AB 



BC 



•»H"- 



pyramid 



cylinder 



TRAP TYPE 



Circle 



pyrannid 



cylinder 

 TRAP TYPE 



Circle 



Figure 1. Mean number of PC's captured by each type of odor-baited and unbaited trap placed on 

 perimeter-row trees. Among all bars in this figure, those superscribed by the same letter are not 

 significantly different from one-another at odds of 19 to 1 . 



1 - 



0.8 - 

 0.6 ■ 

 0.4 

 0.2 

 



BEN+GA 



■ baited 

 D unbaited 



I -\ 

 0.8 

 0.6 

 0.4 

 0.2 







pyramid cylinder 



LIM+GA 



Circle 



■ baited 

 D unbaited 



1 1 

 0.8 

 0.6 

 0.4 

 0.2 







EIV+GA 





@ baited 

 D unbaited 



pyramid 



1 



0.8 

 0.6 

 0.4 

 0.2 ■ 

 



cylinder 



GA 



Circle 



B baited 



D unbaited 



BWP 



|V*^J_ 



3_ 



pyramid 



cylinder 

 TRAP TYPE 



Circle 



pyramid 



cylinder 

 TRAP TYPE 



Circle 



Figure 2. For each trap type, degree of correlation between total amount of PC captures on perimeter- 

 row traps and percent sampled PC injury to fruit on penmeter-row trees in plots having that odor. The 

 higher the R^ value, the greater the extent of the correlation. An asterisk (*) indicates a statistically 

 significant correlation at odds of 19 to 1. 



18 



Fruit Notes, Volume 67, Winter, 2002 



