2.0 

 1.8 

 1.6 

 1.4 

 1.2 

 1.0 



2000 



N^,PANEL;R '-0.19; F-OM 

 '■q. PVRAMID: R '-0.08; F-O.U 



10 12 14 16 18 20 

 MEAN AIR TEMPERATURE ("Q 



^ PANEL: R ^-0.«; f- 0.003 

 ""a. PVRAMID: R "-0.J7; /'-0.09 



8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 

 MEAN AIR TEMPERATURE (°0 



"^ PANEL: R '- 0.51; P« 0,001 

 'a PYRAMID: R ■-0.54;P< 0.001 



8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 

 MEAN AIR TEMPERATURE ("Q 



2 



1. 



a 1- 



S 

 z 



5 



B 



2000 



^ PANEL: R '-0.0I; /'-0.48 

 "n.. PYRAMID: R '-0.03; F'HAO 



Cbr 



00 aj' ^ q: ' a ^ er°5 — g S ' ^u fe 



14 16 18 20 22 

 MEAN AIR TEMPERATURE ("tT) 



2001 



^PANEL:R '-OM; F-0.21 

 ■"D,PVRAMID:R '-O.0I; /'-0.61 



^ ,ggp° ^ S^n ... .g.6.,.^gg.. |^ 



12 14 16 18 20 



MEAN AIR TEMPERATURE (»Q 



2.0- 



1.8 



1.6 



1.4 



1.2 



1.0 



0.8 



0.6 



0.4 



0.2 



0.0 



^PANEL:R '-0.01; P-OM 

 ■■a,PYRAMID:R '-0.01; /"-O.?* 



a 



*1 





10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 

 MEAN AIR TEMPERATURE (°C) 



Figure 2. For each of the five trapping years, relationships between daily PC captures by panel and pyramid traps 

 and mean air temperature either (A) before or (B) after petal fall. The number of days before/after petal fall was 

 23/52 in 2000, 17/43 m 2001, 33/51 m 2002, 24/30 in 2003, and 29/37 m 2004, respectively R' values denote, on 

 a scale of to 1 , the amount of common variation between the two variables. An R^= 1 indicates a perfect correlation. 



Fruit Notes, Volume 69, Fall, 2004 



