FKAGUEKTS OF SCIENCE. 



113 , *„ When this is done, we 



Wt relationship to «d> «*»* the bands follows of ne- 

 find tot the *£?£& of the watch, when acted 

 SC£ force invested in the sp^ ^ o „ 



" Themotionof ^.^J££,ta»-» of Nature 

 ot art, but the case . s.mda w.th 1^ ^ ^ ^ 



These also have the.. -inner m ^.^ U ^ 



foree to set that mechamsm ^gom ^^ t0 fecern 

 of physical science is to CTea he combine d act.on of 



tU rsLe,andtosho W h^fon ; ^ ^ bas.s 



hoth the phenomena ot 



must of necessity flow. even a brief and 



I thought an attempt to g « y ■ scientin0 t b.nk- 



dtotchy illustration of th e -- » ^resting to you 

 t" relrd this problem would ^ b ft wffl give m e 



on 1 c° present occasion ; more especn y ^ ^ 

 occasion to say a word i o n *» fte wh ich men of 



of modern science; to pomt J ^ ^ mere waste of 



science claim as then own, and w . £ p w 



mte to oppose their advance andals^ ^ 



tte bourne between , tins »d ^ ^.^ mteUeot 



the questiomngs and yearn g 



are directed in vain. de d. It was the 



But here your tolerance w.U be ^ ^^ 



American Emerson, }*%£&* apparent i1.3ust.ee 

 siU e to state any truth ^tronly a ^ charactel 



to some other truth. Tru h • * md ,„, 



° k m„ the form of a magnet v , t . V of mMlla nd 



S differences «££%££* <** "** ^Z 



are to be traced to the exel ^ forgetfuhu s 



reaso „e,. dwclWpon oned.aU o^ to be o -to 



of the other. Hie P 1 h Its fair sl.aic 



both halves strongly, and alio ^ ^ g for 



formation of the resn U ^cm 3of afiucst . ou lfflphes pa 



the statement of the two 



