EXPLANATION OF PLATK 11. 23 



Plate 11. V. I. p. 175. 



1. Side View of the head of an Ichthyosaurus, marking 



by corresponding letters, the analogies to Cuvier's 

 figures of the same bones in the head of the Croco- 

 dile. (Conybeare.) 



2. Posterior part of a lower jaw of Ichthyosaurus com- 



munis, in the Oxford Museum. (Conybeare.) 

 3 — 7. Sections presented by the component bones of Fig. 



2 in fractured parts above each section. (Conybeare.) 

 8. View of the lower Jaw of Ichthyosaurus seen from 



codiles ; but as the horny scales of Fishes, and dermal bones of Cro- 

 codilean animals are preserved in the same Lias with the bones of 

 Ichtliyosauri, we may infer that if the latter animals had been fur- 

 nished with any similar appendages, these would also have been pre- 

 served, and long ere this discovered, among the numerous remains 

 that have been so assiduously collected from the Lias. They would 

 certainly have been found in the case of the individual now before 

 us, in which even the Epidermis and vessels of the Rete Mucosum 

 have escaped destruction. 



Similar black patches of petrified skin are not unfrequently found 

 attached to the skeletons of Ichthyosauri from Lyme Regis, but no 

 remains of any other soft parts of the body have yet been noticed. 



The preservation of the skin shews that a short interval only elapsed 

 between the death of the animal, and its interment in the muddy se- 

 diment of which the Lias is composed. 



Among living reptiles, the Batrachians aflbrd an example of an 

 order in which the skin is naked, having neither scales nor dermal 

 bones. 



In the case of Lizards and Crocodiles, the scaly, or bony coverings 

 protect the skin from injury by friction against the hard substances 

 with which they are liable to come into contact upon the land ; but 

 to the Ichthyosauri which lived exclusively in the sea, there would 

 seem to have been no more need of the protection of scales or 

 dermal bones, than to the naked skin of Cetacea. 



In the case of Plesiosauri also, the non-discovery of the remains 

 of any dermal appendages witli the perfect skeletons of animals of 

 that genus,^ leads to a similar inference, that they too had a naked 

 skin. The same negative argument applies to the flying Reptile 

 Family of Pterodactyles. 



