NOTES AND BIBLIOGRAPHY 



1. Cf. John Burnet, Early Greek Philosophy, London, 

 1920, 3 p. 70. 



2. " From quotations I had seen I had a high notion 

 of Aristotle's merits, but I had not the most remote notion 

 what a wonderful man he was. Linnaeus and Cuvier have 

 been my two gods, though in very different ways, but they 

 were mere schoolboys to old Aristotle," in Letter of Darwin 

 to Ogle, 1882, cited by Arthur Piatt, in the preface to his 

 translation of the De Gen. Animalium; also by Charles 

 Singer, " Biology," p. 200, in R. W. Livingstone's The 

 Legacy of Greece, Oxford, 1921. 



3. W. A. Heidel, " Ilept ^vaeus, a study of the con- 

 ception of Nature among the Pre-Socratics," in Proceedings 

 of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences, XLV. lOS 

 (1910). 



4. W. A. Heidel, o.c, p. 106. Professor Heidel has 

 rendered service to scholarship in bringing forward the 

 interpretative value of the Hippocratic writings. In saying 

 " Hippocrates," Professor Heidel is not intending to decide 

 the specific authorship of the tracts drawn upon. 



5. I refer to the Ilept Aialrifs, On Diet, and the 

 Hepl Toprjs, On Generation. A sketch of their contents 

 is given by Charles Singer, in Livingstone's The Legacy 

 of Greece, Oxford, 1921, pp. 168 ff. 



6. The great edition is that of Littre in ten volumes, 

 with almost too ample introductions, and containing the 

 Greek text printed opposite the French translation, fimile 

 Littr6, Oeuvres Completes d'Hippocrate, Paris, 1839-53. 

 While Littr6 was bringing out his volumes, in the middle 

 of the nineteenth century, a good English translation, with 

 judicious introduction and notes, was made of The Genuine 

 Works of Hippocrates, by Francis Adams, under the 



[145] 



