NOTES AND BIBLIOGRAPHY 



not translated thus by Hort. Singer's rendering seemed to 

 me more probable, — though I have made a slight modifi- 

 cation at the end. For it seemed to me less question- 

 begging to translate tu>i> fxeXXovrwv as " what they are 

 about to be," rather than " what they are becoming," as 

 Singer does. 



58. Ibid., I. I. II-. 



59. Ibid., III. 8. i; Cf. II. 6. 6. Sometimes what the 

 ancients took for " male " and " female " were really dif- 

 ferent species. 



60. Ibid., II. 8. 4. 



61. Charles Singer, " Greek Biology and its Relation 

 to the Rise of Modern Biology," in Singer's Studies in the 

 History and Method of Science, Oxford, 1921; Vol. 11. 

 p. 98. 



62. For the next few pages I have followed, in the 

 main: Theodor Meyer-Steineg, Geschichte der Medizin, 

 Jena, 1921; Max Neuburger, History of Medicine, Trans- 

 lation by Ernest Playfair, Oxford, 1910; Vol. I.; Sir T. 

 Clifford Allbutt, Greek Medicine in Rome, London, 1921, 



63. Soporific or some kind of anesthetic expedients 

 seem to have been used commonly, to deaden pain. 



64. Sir Clifford Allbutt does not eliminate this con- 

 fusion, properly enough, from his interesting discussion of 

 the matter, in chapter X of his Greek Medicine in 

 Rome, o.c. 



65. Cf. III. I. with III. 2. of Galen; On the Natural 

 Faculties, with an English Translation by Arthur John 

 Brock, in The Loeb Classical Library, New York, 1916. 



66. F. H. Garrison, Introduction to the History of 

 Medicine, Philadelphia, 1921,3 p. 105. 



67. Galen, On the Natural Faculties, o.c, n. 6$. 



68. Brock, in his Introductioti, p. XXX, compares him 

 with Bergson. 



69. Why not protoplasmic? 



70. On the Natural Faculties, Brock's Translation, 

 o.c, I. s. 



71. On The Natural Faculties, Brock's Translation, o.c, 

 I. 5-8, with an occasional verbal alteration. 



[150] 



