278 



ten years, have been excluded from waters to which they had free 

 access for twenty-five years after the negotiation of the treaty. In 

 1845, this exclusion was relaxed so far as concerns the Bay of Fundy, 

 but the just and liberal intention of the home government, in compli- 

 ance with what we think the true construction of the convention, to 

 open all the other outer bays to our fishermen, was abandoned, in con- 

 sequence of the opposition of the colonies. Notwithstanding this, the 

 United States have, since the Bay of Fundy was reopened to our fish- 

 ermen in 1845, pursued the most liberal course towards the colonial 

 fishing interests. By the revenue law of 1846, the duties on colonial 

 fish entering our ports were very greatly reduced, and, by the ware- 

 housing act, it is allowed to be entered in bond without payment of 

 duty. In this way, colonial fish has acquired the monopoly of the ex- 

 port trade in our market, and is entering, to some extent, into the home 

 consumption. These facts were among those which increased the sen- 

 sibihty of our fishing interest at the movement in question. 



" These circumstances, and the incidents above alluded to, have led 

 me to think the moment favorable for a reconsideration of the entire 

 subject of the fisheries on the coasts of the British provinces, with a 

 view to place them upon a more liberal footing of reciprocal privilege. 

 A wilhngness to meet us in some arrangement of this kind is understood 

 to exist on the part of Great Britain, with a desire on her part to in- 

 clude in one comprehensive settlement as well this subject as the com- 

 mercial intercourse between the United States and the British provinces. 

 I have thought that, whatever arrangements may be made on these 

 two subjects, it is expedient that they should be embraced in separate 

 conventions. The ilhiess and death of the late Secretary of State pre- 

 vented the commencement of the contemplated negotiation. Pains have 

 been taken to collect the information requned for the details of such an 

 arrangement. The subject is attended with consideral^le difliculty. 

 If it is found practicable to come to an agreement mutually acceptable 

 to the two parties, conventions may be concluded in the course of the 

 present winter. The control of Congress over all the provisions of such 

 an arrangement, affecting the revenue, will ol course be reserved." 



Our latest accounts from two of the British colonics show that oppo- 

 sition is still manifested to an adjustment of the dispute on terms which 

 would be satisfactory to the United States. 



The resolutions which follow, and which were adopted at a public 

 meeting at St. John, New Brunswicrk, December, 1852, uidicate, prob- 

 ably, tlie temper of the commercial class of that city: 



" Ilcsohed, That this meeting consider the coast fisheries of the North 

 American colonies the natural right and property of the inhabitants 

 thereof, and that they should not be ahenated, conceded, nor affected 

 without their consent, in any negotiation with the United States gov- 

 ernment, or any other foreign power, without their consent, inasmuch as 

 the value of the fisheries to the British provinces, with an increased and 

 increasing population, cannot be estimated aright at the present time. 



■* Resolved, That this meeting view with deep anxiety and concern 

 the announcement in her Majesty's speech to the imperial Parliament, 

 that negotiations are now pending between her Majesty's government 

 and that of the United States, relative to the fisheries of" the North 



