READING LIST 



465 



son, 1902; Mendel's Versuche uber Pfianzenhybriden, two papers (1865 and 

 1869), edited by Tschermak, 1901; Ann. Rept. Smithson. Inst., 1901-1902; 

 Pop. Sci. Mo., vol. 62, 1903; vol. 63, 1904; Science, vol. 23, 1903. Galton: 

 Pap. Sci. Mo., vol. 29, 1886; Nature, vol. 70, 1907; Memories of my Life, 

 1908; Galton's Natural Inheritance, 1889. Weismann: Brief Autobiography, 

 with portrait, in The Lamp, vol. 26, 1903; Solomonsen, Bericht uber die 

 Feier des 70 Geburtstages von August Weismann, 1904; Weismann's The 

 Germ-Plasm, 1893, and The Evolution Theory, 1904. 



CHAPTER XV 



History of Geology and Paleontology, Zittel, 1901. The Founders of 

 Geology, Geikie, 2d edition, 1905. History and Methods of Paleonto- 

 logical Discovery, Marsh, Proceed. Am. Adv. Sci., 1879. Same article in 

 Pop. Sci. Mo., vol. 16, 1879-1880. The Rise and Progress of Paleontology, 

 Huxley, Pop. Sci. Mo., vol. 20, 1882. Lyell: Charles Lyell and Modern 

 Geology, Bonney, iSg^; Sketch in Pop. Sci. Mo., vol. I, 1872, also vol. 

 20, 1881-1882. Owen: Life of, by his grandson, 2 vols., 1894; See also 

 above under Chapter VII. Agassiz: Life and Correspondence, by his 

 wife, 2 vols., 1885; Life, letters and works, Marcou, 2 vols., 1896; What 

 we Owe to Agassiz, Wilder, Pop. Sci. Mo., July, 1907; Agassiz at Penikese, 

 Am. Nat., 1898. Cope: A Great Naturalist, Osborn in The Century, 1897; 

 See above, under Chapter VII, for further references. Marsh : Pop. Sci. Mo., 

 Vol. 13, 1878; Sketches of, Nature, vol. 59, 1898-99; Science, vol. 9, 1899; 

 Am. J. Sci., vol. 157, 1899. Zittel: Biographical Sketch with portrait, 

 Schuchert, Ann. Rept. Smithson. Inst., 1903-1904. Osborn, Papers on 

 Paleontological Discovery in Science from 1899 onward; The Age of Mam- 

 mals, 19 10. The Fayum Expedition of the Am. Museum of Nat. History, 

 Science, March 29, 1907. 



Note. Since the four succeeding chapters deal with the Evolution 

 Theory, it may be worth while to make a few general comments on the liter- 

 ature pertaining to Organic Evolution. The number of books and articles 

 is very extensive, and I have undertaken to sift from the great number ;i 

 limited list of the more meritorious. Owing to the prevalent vagueness 

 regarding evolution theories, one is likely to read only about Darwin and 

 Darwinism. This should be avoided by reading as a minimum some good 

 reference on Lamarck, Weismann, and De Vries, as well as on Darwin. 

 It is well enough to begin with Darwin's Theory, but it is not best to take 

 his Origin of Species as the first book. To do this is to, place oneself fifty 

 years in the past. The evidences of Organic Evolution have greatly multi- 

 plied since 1859, and a better conception of Darwin's Theory can be ob- 

 tained byreading first Romanes's Darwin and After Darwin, voL I- Thia to 

 be followed by Wallace's Darwinism, and, thereafter, the ( >rigin <»f Spe< la 



