28 SECOND SUPPLEMENT TO THE CRAG MOLLUSCA. 



which, in the present case, I have not been able to do. Our present shell corresponds 

 with the size and form of the figure given by Dr. von Konen, but not quite so much so 

 with the figure by Dr. Speyer, who refers his shell to Dr. von Konen's species. Dr. 

 Speyer's figure, however, shows an obsolete keel (or the vestige of a keel) at the base of 

 the volution, which is not visible in my specimen, nor in von Konen's figure. My speci- 

 men seems to have had a very slight curvature at the lower part of the outer lip, but as 

 it is not quite perfect this is obscure. The apex is rather obtuse, and the volutions, of 

 which there are 7 8, are very slightly convex, giving a depression, or great distinctness 

 to the suture. 



EULIMA HEBE, Semper. 2nd Sup., Tab. IV, fig. 18. 



EULIMA HEBE, Semper. Palaeont. Unters., s. i, 171 (fide Speyer). 



Speyer. Cassil. Tert. Conch., p. 203, taf. xxvii, fig. 2. 



Locality. Cor. Crag, Sutton. 



Germany : Ober-Oligocene, Nieder-Kaufungen. 



The specimen figured is the only one which I have seen, and was found by myself in 

 the Cor. Crag of Sutton. Having now been enabled to compare it with specimens from 

 the German beds, I can assign it as above. 



EULIMA ROBUSTA, A. Bell, MS. 2nd Sup., Tab. IV, fig. 17. 



Axis, % an inch. 



Locality. Red Crag, Waldringfield. 



This shell, from Dr. Reed's Cabinet, with the above name given to it by Mr. A. Bell, 

 has recently been put into my hands. It somewhat resembles E. acicula of Sandberger, 

 figured and described by Dr. Speyer, ' Cass. Tert. Conch./ p. 205, tab. xxvii, fig. 4, but 

 has apparently fewer and more convex volutions, and is not so elongate and tapering as 

 that species. The apex of our specimen is broken, and the outer lip is nearly straight, 

 like that of Eul. intermedia, but it differs from that species in the convexity of the 

 volution. It is doubtless derivative in the Red Crag. 



The shell figured in my 1st Supplement (tab. iv, fig. 25) as E. stenostoma, Jeff., 

 has since been so injured as to be unrecognisable, so that I am doubtful of its correct 

 assignment, and whether it may not be the shell given above under the name of E. Hebe, 

 Semper. 



On the other hand, I have specimens from the Coralline Crag of Eulima differing 



