A HISTORY OF HAMPSHIRE 



1563 her son George Ludlow became her heir. 1 " 

 His son Sir Edmund succeeded him in I58o," 8 and 

 obtained a grant from the king of free warren in his 

 lands here and elsewhere in i6i8." 9 Four years later, 

 however, Allington manor was purchased by John 

 Major of Southampton for 900." Major died in 

 1630, and was succeeded by his son Richard." 1 He left 

 Allington to his nephew Major Dunch, who had also 

 inherited Baddesley and Townhill manors before 

 1672."' 



From this date Allington manor follows the same 

 descent as the manor of Townhill (q.v.). 



The manor of B4RTON in South Stoneham is 

 called B4RTON PEFEREL, from the family of 

 Peverel, which appears to have held it from a very 

 early date. 



Andrew Peverel inherited lands there in 1227 on 

 the death of his father Robert. 183 On Andrew's 

 death it passed to his son Thomas, who died in 

 1306,'" being followed by his son Andrew, 1 * 5 who 

 died in I328, ll6 and his grandson, another Andrew, 

 successively. 



The latter died without issue in 1376,"' when 

 Barton Peverel was divided between his two great 

 nephews, Edward Fitz Herbert and John Brocas, 

 grandsons respectively of his sisters Lucy and Alice. 1 * 8 



On the death of John Brocas without issue in 

 13778 Edward acquired the whole manor, 1 * 9 which 

 in 1387, subject to the life interest of his widow 

 Joan, passed to his sister Alice, wife of Thomas 

 West. 130 Her son Thomas, 131 and his two sons, 

 Thomas IS * and Reginald, afterwards Lord De La 

 Warr, 133 held it successively. 



From Reginald it passed to Richard, 13 * and thence 

 to Thomas West, 135 who in I 539 sold Barton Peverel 

 manor to Peter Philpott, 136 in whose family it 

 descended, like Swaythling (q.v.), until 1636, when 

 Henry Philpott, a noted recusant, sold it to Edward 

 Bosden. 1 " 



Shortly afterwards it was acquired by Benjamin 

 Wybarne on a lease for thirteen years, but owing 

 to his recusancy it was sequestered in 1645. Edward 

 Bosden appealed to the crown on the expiration of 

 the term and obtained the discharge of the estate. 1 ** 

 He apparently disposed of all claim in Barton Peverel 

 manor to his lessee, Wybarne, whose son John held 

 the manor and its water-mill in I7I9- 139 



In 1759 Katherine Wybarne held the manor, 1 " 1 

 but in 1764 the property was purchased by Thomas 

 Lee Dummer, 141 and from this date has followed 

 the descent of the manors of Netley and Hound, 14 * 

 Mr. Tankerville Chamberlayne being the present 

 lord of the manor. 



The manor of E4STLEIGH, in South Stoneham, 

 is given in the Domesday Survey as the property 

 of Henry the Treasurer, and a former possession of 

 Earl Godwin. 14 ' 



The overlordship of the manor during the next 

 two centuries is difficult to trace. In 1260 Her- 

 bert son of Peter answered for the Eastleigh fee, 

 but in 1306 it was held by the Beauchamps of the 

 king in chief by the service of being chamberlain of 

 the king's exchequer. 144 The Beauchamp estates 

 passed by marriage to Richard Nevill, earl of 

 Warwick, the king-maker. His wife was a Beau- 

 champ, and survived both her husband and her two 

 daughters. 



At the beginning of the reign of Henry VII 

 she granted the whole of the Warwick estates to the 

 king and his heirs male. 145 From this date the 

 manor of Eastleigh has been held directly of the 

 crown. 146 



In 1167 Ralph de Eastleigh held lands here, 14 ' 

 being followed by his son Hugh, who in 1219 

 increased the estate by the purchase of other lands 

 from Richard son of Guy, and John de Venoiz, from 

 whom he was to hold the same by the service of a 

 third part of a knight's fee. 148 



At the latter end of this century Eastleigh had 

 passed into the possession of William de Roos and 

 Eustacia his wife. 149 In 1271 they conveyed it to 

 William de Wyntershull and Beatrice his wife, to 

 hold of William de Roos and his heirs by a rent of 

 a pair of gold spurs. 150 Eastleigh became the pro- 

 perty of John de Wyntershull, son of William, in 

 I287, 151 and at his death passed to his brother Walter, 

 who was holding in I295 15 * and I3i6. 153 



William, who died in 1362, demised it to Thomas 

 his brother, 154 who died in 1 388, 155 and was succeeded 

 by his son, another Thomas, on whose death in 1417 

 the manor passed to Thomas de Wyntershull his son. 15 * 

 He died without issue in 1420, when the manor was 

 divided between his sisters, Joan wife of William 

 Calton, and Agnes wife of William Basset. 157 Agnes 



"7 Chan. Inq. p.m. 5-6 Eliz. (Ser. 2), 

 vol. looz, No. 7. 



118 Ibid. 22 Eliz. pt. 2, No. 122. 



119 Pat. 15 Jas. I. pt. 15, m. 14. 



120 Close, 20 Jas. I, pt. 8. m. 21. 



1!a Chan. Inq. p.m. 5 Chas. I. pt. 18, 

 No. 26. 



1M Recov. R. Mich. 24 Chas. II. 

 rot. 210. 



128 Excerpta e Rot. Fin. (Rec. Com.), 

 162. These lands were held of the king 

 in chief. 



Iw Chan. Inq. p.m. 34 Edw. I, No. 

 39. Thomas was seised of a moiety of 

 the manor only. The property included 

 a water-mill. 



" 5 Feud. Aids, ii, 318. 



1M Chan. Inq. p.m. i Edw. Ill (2nd 

 Nos.), 20 i ibid. 2 Edw. Ill, No. 53. 



"7 Ibid. 49 Edw. Ill, pt. 2 (ist Nos.), 

 26. ^ Ibid. 



Ibid. I Ric. II, No. 4 ; ibid. 2 

 Ric. II, No. 93. This document refers 

 to a water-mill and inclosed (separalis) 

 water. 



130 Chan. Inq. p.m. 10 Ric. II, No. 

 iS ; ibid. 16 Ric. II, pt. I, No. 10. Joan 

 died in 1 393. 



131 Ibid. 19 Ric. II, No. 49. 

 1M Ibid. 7 Hen. IV, No. 26. 

 188 Ibid. 4 Hen. V, No. 28. 

 1M Ibid. 29 Hen. VI, No. 21. 

 1" Ibid. 16 Edw. IV, No. 62. 



186 Feet of F. Hants, Hil. 30 Hen. 

 VIII. 



18 ' Recov. R. Trin. 12 Chas. I, rot. 

 22. 



188 Cat. of Com. for Compounding, 996-7. 



189 Recov. R. Hil. 6 Ceo. I, rot. 84. 

 " Com. Pleas Recov. R. Hil. 3 Geo. 



II, m. 6. 



141 Ibid. Hil. 4 Geo. Ill, m. 69. 



" See Hound. 



148 V.C.H. Hann, i, 5000. 



144 Chan. Inq. p.m. 34 Edw. I, No. 13; 

 ibid. 1 1 Ric. II, No. 54, 



145 G.E.C. Complete Peerage. 



146 Chan. Inq. p.m. 41 Eliz. pt. 2 

 (Ser. 2), No. 36 ; ibid. 6 Chas. I, pt. 2 

 (Ser. 2), No. 121. 



486 



1J 7 Pipe R. 13 Hen. II. In 1200 

 licence was given to a certain William 

 Brewer for the building of a castle either 

 at Stoke or Eastleigh in Hampshire 

 (Rot. Chart. 2 John, m. 28 ; Duchy of 

 Lane. Misc. Bks. xi, 3), but the fact that 

 there is no subsequent allusion to a castle 

 proves that his choice did not fall upon 

 the latter place. 



"' Feet of F. Hants, 3 Hen. Ill ; ibid. 

 Mich. 4 Hen. III. 



Feet of F. Hants, Mich. 56 Hen. 

 III. 



150 Ibid. ; Close, 15 Edw. I, m. 5. 



141 Chan. Inq. p.m. 15 Edw. I, No. 



'5- 



isa F(:( . t of p. Hants, East. 24 Edw. I. 

 158 Feud. Aids, ii, 318. 

 154 Chan. Inq. p.m. 35 Edw. Ill, pt. 2, 

 No. 82. 



i Ibid, ii Ric. II, No. 54. 

 "8 Ibid. 5 Hen. V, No. 52. 

 15 ~ Feud. Aids, ii, 351. 



