A HISTORY OF SURREY 



Edward it was worth 4 pounds ; now 100 

 shillings. 



IN WODETON [WOTTON] HUNDRED 



Oswold himself holds ODETONE [Wotton]. 1 

 Harold held it in the time of king Edward, 

 but the men of the Hundred say that they do 

 not know how Harold had it. It was then 

 assessed for 6 hides ; now for 5 hides. The 

 land is .* In demesne there is I plough ; 

 and (there are) 20 villeins and 7 bordars 

 with 8 ploughs. There is a mill worth 

 2O shillings ; and 3 acres of meadow. Wood 

 worth 50 hogs. For the herbage, 23 hogs. In 

 the time of king Edward, and afterwards, it 

 was worth 8 pounds ; now 7 pounds. 



Of these hides, Richard de Tonebrige 

 holds I hide, 8 and Corbelin of him. Tedric 

 held it of Harold as a manor. It was then 

 assessed for I hide, now for half. There is 

 half a plough ; and 2 villeins, and i serf. It 

 was then worth 20 shillings ; now 10 shillings. 



IN WbCHINGES [WOKING] HUNDRED 



Oswold himself holds WISELEI [Wisley]. 

 He himself held it of earl Harold. It was 

 then assessed for 3^ hides; now for i^ hides. 

 The land is for 2 ploughs. In demesne there 

 is i ; and there are 4 villeins and 4 bordars with 



2 ploughs. There is a church ; and 2 serfs ; 

 and a mill worth 10 shillings; and 6 acres 

 of meadow ; and a fishery worth 5 pence. 

 Wood worth 6 hogs. . . In the time of 

 king Edward it was worth 40 shillings ; now 

 60 shillings. 



IN BRIXISTAN [BRIXTON] HUNDRED 



Teodric the goldsmith holds of the King 

 CHENINTUNE [Kennington], He himself held 

 it of king Edward. It was then assessed for 5 

 hides ; now for I hide and 3 virgates. The 

 land is for 2^ ploughs. In demesne there is 

 i plough ; and (there are) 4 villeins and 3 

 bordars with 2 ploughs. There is i serf ; 

 and 4 acres of meadow. It was, and is, worth 



3 pounds. 



1 No doubt Wotton, though spelt differ- 

 ently from the Hundred. It is contiguous to 

 the rest of the old estate of Oswold. The 

 hide of Richard de Tonebrige is represented 

 by De Clare land at Wotton in 1314. 



A blank in the MS. 



8 Perhaps the small manor of Gosterwood 

 or Gostwood in Wotton. In 1300 Nicholas 

 Malemeyns, sub-tenant of Gilbert de Clare at 

 Ockley, also held Gostwood, which is adjacent 

 to Ockley. 



IN WALETON [WALLINGTON] HUNDRED 



Tezelin the cook holds of the King EDIN- 

 TONE [Addington].* Godric held it of king 

 Edward. It was then assessed for 8 hides; 

 now for I hide. The land is for 4 ploughs. 

 In demesne there are 2 ploughs ; and (there 

 are) 8 villeins and 9 cottars with 2^ ploughs. 

 Wood worth 20 hogs. It is, and was, worth 

 100 shillings. 



IN CHINGESTUN [KINGSTON] HUNDRED 



Ansgot B the interpreter holds of the King 

 CuMBE 6 [Coombe]. Cola held it in the time 

 of king Edward. It was then assessed for 3 

 hides; now for i^ hides. The land is for 3 

 ploughs. In demesne there is I ; and (there 

 are) 6 villeins and i bordar with i plough ; 

 and 4 acres of meadow. From the herbage, 

 4 hogs. It is worth 60 shillings. 



IN WOCHINGES [WOKING] HUNDRED 



Chetel the 



LODESORDE. 7 



Edward. It 

 now for half. 



huntsman holds of the King 



His father held it of king 



was then assessed for I hide ; 



The land is for 2 ploughs. In 



328 



demesne there is I ; and (there are) 2 villeins 

 and 5 bordars with i plough. There is a mill 

 worth 2 shillings ; and 4 acres of meadow. 

 Wood worth 20 hogs. It is, and was, worth 

 50 shillings. 



IN GODELMINGE [GoDALMING] HUNDRED 



Wulwi the huntsman holds of the King 

 LITELTONE [Littleton]. 8 He himself held it 

 of king Edward. Then (it was assessed for) 

 2 hides, but they did not pay geld ; now (it is 

 assessed) for i virgate. The land is for I 

 plough. It is there in demesne, with i villein 

 and i cottar with i plough. There are 2 

 acres of meadow. It is, and was, worth 20 

 shillings. 



4 Peter, son of the mayor of London, held 

 half Addington by service as cook, 12121217. 



6 Ansgot was an extensive holder of land 

 as an undertenant at Mitcham and Streatham. 

 An Ansgot had also, T.R.E., held Farncombe. 

 They need not be all the same. 



6 See above, 36, b. i., for another part of 

 the same. 



T Not known in Surrey. Probably Lods- 

 worth in Sussex, there being no definite 

 boundary running through the forest between 

 the counties. In that case, however, the 

 ascription to Woking Hundred is arbitrary. 



8 Littleton, near Guildford and Loseley. 



