9 



of attainment, yet fully adequate to its propofed 

 purpofes. 



Tejiimonies in Favour of this Work, 

 ** Mr. B had previoufly publiflied the Ana- 

 tomy of the Horfe, re-publiflied in this Work, in 

 which he profefies the parts treated of have been 

 moft of them taken from his own diffe^lions. So far 

 he has. a fair claim of originality." " The drawings 

 appear extremely corred ; are executed in the moll 

 handfome manner; and the defcriptive part is very 

 corred." 



London Medical Review. 



^^ The fecond divifion of the Work is occupied 

 with the Anatomy of the Horfe, including the phy- 

 fiology, or knowledge of fundions. This part of 

 the Work is materially iiluftrated by engravings, th^ 

 execution of which has confiderable merit." 



" The third divifion is allotted to the pradical 

 part of the veterinary art, or a defcription of the dif- 

 eafes of the horfe, ox, fliecp, and dog, with the 

 mofl approved modes of cure. From the length of 

 the anatomical part of the Work, the prefent part is, 

 perhaps, more compreiTed than might be wifhed. The 

 claffification adopted by the author will materially 

 aflift the ftudent in this branch of medicine, who is 

 too apt to be mifled by the barbarous and unmean- 

 ing jargon adopted, in general, in books of farriery." 



Med» and Chirurg, Review, 



