117 

 199. 



1. Unknown. 

 3. 250. 



5. Unknown. 



6. 1 per cent. 



8. Two known. 



9. Hcaltliy. 



II. IVIy answer to this has hcen more fully given in my rctm-n of the '■ cattle. 



In this poor, dry, but licaltliy coimtry, I am much afraid that the interference of the 

 law would be felt an evil more than the disease of pleuro-pneiunonia. 



200. 



3. Between 700 and 800. 



9. In perfect health. 



10. Very few were infected on this run. What died on this run was through starvation. 



11. I don't think that inoculation is of any service. 



201. 



1. On or about .January, 1866. 



3. 3,500 head. 



4. In strong condition. 



5. Twelve months. 



6. From 7 to 9. 



7. About Jamiary, 1867. 



8. About 220. 



9. Well and sound. 



10. None. 



11. Yes. 



202. 



3. 100. 



9. Healthy. 



10. I have seen a few cattle dead lately, but I suppose it is from eating thistles. I have 

 not any cnttle diseased, and have had no experience whatever, therefore I am soiry 

 I cannot give you any information. 



1 1 . I consider an Act should be passed for the above. 



203. 



I. 5th July, 1865. 



3. 700. 



4. In good condition. 



0. Three months. 

 7. October, 1865. 



9. In good condition. 

 11. As f;ir as my experience in inoculating, I do not think it sufficiently dangerous to pass 

 an Act to oblige any one to hioculate. 



204. 



1. About the middle of the year 1865. 



3. About 4,000 head. 



4. In good condition. 



5. About twelve months. 



6. Fifty. 



7. In 1866. 



8. Ten per cent. 



9. Healthy. 



10. I never inoculated my cattle. 



11. No. 



206. 



1. October, 1867. 



3. 3,000. 



4. Good. 



5. Six months. 



6. Fifteen per cent. 



7. June, 1868. 



8. Ten per cent. 



9. Healthy. 



II. Yes. 



