7 o 4 POPULAR SCIENCE MONTHLY. 



Giddings believes in the possibility of a dynamic science of society or not, 

 lie was fully justified, in view* of the circumstances, in confining himself 

 strictly, as he has done, to the statical and historical aspects of sociology. 

 Moreover, there was the less need of departing from this line, as there is in 

 this country a school of dynamic sociologists, no more sanguine than he of 

 immediate reforms, but working along the lines of social mechanics, to 

 whom that aspect of the question may properly be left. 



In view of this v^ry youth of the science, and especially of the confusion 

 of ideas as to what sociology means, it will be profitable at the outset to 

 examine Prof. Giddings's definitions. The first is given on pages 5 and C, 

 where he says: "It is not too much to claim that we have now, at length, a 

 sociology, which may be defined as the systematic description and explana- 

 tion of society viewed as a whole. It is the general science of social 

 phenomena." He recognizes, however, that social phenomena are chiefly 

 distinguished from all other classes by the psychic element that enters into 

 them, and on page 25 he rather sententiously remarks that "psychology is 

 the science of the association of ideas. Sociology is the science of the asso- 

 ciation of minds." This he qualifies on the next page in the following 

 form : " Psychology thus is the science of the elements and of the genesis 

 of mental phenomena, as determined by physical and organic relations. 

 Sociology is the science of mental phenomena in their higher complica- 

 tions and reactions, and of the constructive evolution of a social medium, 

 through which the adaptations of life and its environment become recip- 

 rocal." 



One of the most difficult questions has been to distinguish sociology as a 

 science from what have been called the " special social sciences" i. e., the 

 several groups of phenomena obviously social, which, whatever sociology 

 may be, must stand in some intimate relation to it. On this Prof. Gid- 

 dings, pages 30, 31, makes the following observations: 



" Clear thinking and a discriminating use of terms will create order 

 from the confusion and will establish sociology in its rightful place, where 

 it can no longer encroach on the territory of other sciences or be crowded 

 out of the field by them. Sociology is a general social science, but a gen- 

 eral science is not necessarily a group of sciences. No doubt the word will 

 continue to be used as a short term for the social sciences taken collectively. 

 . . . By methods of sound logic, and with guidance from the history of 

 other sciences, sociology can be definitely marked off from the special 

 social sciences." And on page 33 he adds: " Therefore, while sociology in 

 the broadest sense of the word is the comprehensive science of society, coex- 

 tensive with the entire field of the special social sciences, in a narrower sense 

 and for purposes of university study and of general exposition it may be 

 defined as the science of social elements and first principles." 



Finally, on page 419, he gives the following definition : 



" Sociology is an interpretation of social phenomena in terms of psy- 

 chical, organic adjustment, natural selection, and the conservation of en- 

 ergy. ... It is strictly an explanatory science, fortifying induction by 

 deduction, and referring effects to veritable causes." 



Although these various definitions are somewhat bewildering if not in- 

 consistent, they do nevertheless afford some idea of what sociology is, and 

 it is clear that they give no countenance to the practice of making it a gen- 

 eral receptacle for all sorts of reform programmes and theories of social re- 



