26 INTRODUCTION. 



and German equivalents to look for a definition of my 

 intention in the English word " Thought." I am not 

 aware that French literature possesses any " histoire de 

 la pensee," either of a longer or shorter period ; I know 

 of innumerable works in German which cover a similar 

 field, but they have mostly used the word Weltanschauung, 

 or expanded the meaning of Thought into the wider sense 

 of a history of Civilisation (Kulturgeschichte) or narrowed 

 , it to that of Literature, proving as it seems to me 



46. the real want of a concise term such as the English 



Want of 



FnGemln 11 l an g ua ge now supplies. And yet, I think I am. right 



and French. j n sav i n g that the conception of Thought, in the sense 



in which I am using it, is truly an outcome of interna- 



47. tional, not of specifically English progress, and belongs 

 De^thf. 1111 ma i n ly to the period of which I am treating, a period 

 cm s caity 8pe " characterised, as I have already remarked, by the great 



interchange of ideas, by the breaking down of intellectual 

 barriers, between the principal European nationalities. 



48. It was above all in the mind of Thomas Carlyle, who first 



Carlyle the J 



a?peciaf ve amon g Englishmen made a profound study of the intel- 

 tTeTord* lectual agencies which brought about the great change in 

 modern Europe, that the conception formed itself of an 

 intellectual and spiritual organism, underlying and moving 

 external events. He first gave the peculiar sense to the 

 word Thought, in which we here employ it, and made it 

 an object of special study for those who came after him ; 

 an object, indeed, definable in various ways and to be con- 

 templated from differing points of view, but yet a some- 

 thing, a power recognised by every one, and for which no 

 better word could be invented. No other language has a. 

 word so comprehensive, denoting at once the process and 



