THE BEE-KEEPERS* REVIEW 301 



Published Monthly 

 E. B. TYRRELL, Managing Editor. 

 Office — 230 U'oodla?id Ave., Detroit, Michigan 

 Associate Editors: 

 E. D. TOWNSEND, Northstar, Mich. WESLEY FOSTER, Boulder, Colo. 



Entered as second-class matter, July 7, 1911, at the post ofifice at Detroit, Michigan, under 

 the Act of March 3, 1879. 



Terms — $1.00 a year to subscribers in the United States, Canada, Cuba, Mexico, Ha- 

 waiian Islands, Porto Rico, Philippine Islands, and Shanghai, China. To all other countries 

 the rate is $1.24. 



DLscontinuanoes — Unless a request is received to the contrary, the subscription will be 

 discontinued at the expiration of the time paid for. At the time a subscription expires a 

 notice will be sent, and a subscriber wishing the subscription continued, who will renew later, 

 should send a request to that effect. 



Advertising rates on application. 



EDITORIAL 



An Editorial Board of Review. 



The members of the National will welcome the information 

 that Ave now have an Editorial Board. This broadens the scope of 

 our journal, taking it from the ranks of a one-man publication. The 

 editorial field can be much better covered by three editors than one, 

 and it will give me, as your Secretary, a much better chance to 

 push the business end of your association. I am glad to have the 

 .support of two such good men as Mr. Townsend and Mr. Foster. 



Committee on Grading Rules. 



Acting on Director Townsend's suggestion I will take up the 

 matter with the buyers regarding a committee to represent them 

 at the next convention and hope to be able to announce their names 

 in the September Review. This is getting the matter down to a 

 "definite action and should accomplish some results. 



Gleanings Helps The Review in Its Fight for Uniform Grading 



Rules. 



I was pleased to note in July 15th Gleanings an editorial sug- 

 •gesting the very plan of establishing a set of uniforni grading rules 

 that I had proposed in the July Review. It is a peculiar coincidence 

 that both editorials mentioned were written without the knowledge 

 that the view taken was in accord with the other's views. I cer- 

 taining appreciate having the assistance of CAcanwgs in this matter, 

 .as I am still of the same belief that I had when I started the discus- 



