THE BEE-KEEPERS- REVIEW 431 



That Article 8 be amended as follows: 



Section 2 shall be stricken from the constitution, and Section 3 

 inserted in its place. 



That Article 9 shall be as follows : 



Section 1. The Bee-Keepers' Review, a monthly i^ublication, 

 shall be published by this Association as its official organ. 



Section 2. Xotices and reports published in the official organ, 

 The Bee-Keepers' Review, shall be considered ample and sufficient 

 notice to the members, and it shall not be considered necessary to 

 send a written or printed notice in addition to the one published 

 in the "Review." 



Articles 9 and 10 shall be changed to Articles 10 and 11 

 respectively. 



The delegates shall have power to change such other parts of 

 the constitution as shall be deemed necessary after due and careful 

 deliberation. 



Can Honey Producers Do Without the Middle-Man? 



{Co7itinued from page 425) 



like to give the members, many more members must be enrolled. 

 ^^'hy is it that the ruralist is so indifferent about co-operation? Are 

 Ave in a rut so deep that it is impossible to extricate ourselves along 

 this great field of co-operation? I am sure not, for are there not 

 several associations already co-operating to the mutual advantage of 

 their members, both in the sale of the products of the apiary and 

 the buying of their supplies? As member Hedstrom says: "Let 

 us follow Mr. Hastings' advice, and co-operate. If we do our part 

 it will be easy for the Association to do its." This is good logic, 

 and I assure ^Ir. Hedstrom that the present officers of the National 

 will ever be ready to do their part for the betterment of the Asso- 

 ciation and its members. We are prosperous. The fact is, the 

 National was never in a position to do for its members more than it 

 can and is doing today, but we will never stop "plugging" for new 

 members as long as there is a single bee-keeper outside of the 

 Association. — E. D. T. 



Blairstown, X. J.. 6/16/12. should be the organ of the National; no 



Dear Editor Tyrrell ■ other publication could so well fill the 



The taking over of the Review by the P'^J^^ ^"^ methinks it was horned to that 



National is the best thing in the bee ^"t- , , i- j ..u 



world since the founding of Ghanings. ^, V" "?^-\ "°t have realized the power 



Little knew the late W. Z. H. when he '■\^\'\ shallsway over the ^at.onal; it 



named his paper The Bee-Keepers' Re- '^^" '^*^ ^^ ^^e red, white and blue w-av- 



view that it would be such a fitting pre- '"- °''^'' °"'' "°f^ "^t'°"- ^^^^'^-^'^ ^ ^^\ 



hide to the great National and soon after f"*^^' ^'^''^-''^ ^^^'"§^ P*^^^'^''- P^^^^ ^"^ 



its founder found his last peaceful rest- narmonv \ours forever, 



ingiplace. How fitting that the Review Wm. Eugene Conklix. 



