B. MiYAZAWA 71 



In the alxwe Tablo tlu» doviatinn nf thr t<a4il nuiulMT (=» t 12«r)()) in 

 somewhat Iargt»r than the Htniulanl eiT«»r (- ± J) 817), hnt the ciifliTfnce 

 betwtH?n them in not very hirg«'. FurthtTiiiore, if w«» examine each 

 family sejianit^yly we siH» that only Id N<>. 44—2 in th<» drviatinn larger 

 thaii the Htandanl ern»r hut evi-n hon« not lar^or than twice the laM^T. 

 so that the i\*8ult^ in this ease an» similar to thnsi* gained in F.^ and /*, 

 (see Tablet! II and VII). 



2. ** Iful'uriii.'* 



SecMJs were «)btaine<i from 17 F^ plants with white-margined flowers 

 and we had in /\ H fan\ilies of plants which hri'ed true to the " hukurin " 

 condition. The results from 9 families of plants which exhibited the 

 segregation are shewn in Table XIX. 



From these results we see that they are in perfect agreement with 

 those obtained in F^ (see Table IX). As the number of plants with 

 white-margined flowers was relatively smaller in jx>t- than in field- 

 culture, we find always some deficiency of plants with white-margined 

 flowers under the ex{)ected number. 



3. Flower-colour. 



The results are shewn in Table XX, («)—(/<). 



The segregation shewn in {a) is similar to that occurring in F. ; that 

 shewn in (6) and in (c) is, respectively, similar to that shewn in Tables 

 XV and XIV. The segregation shewn in {d) w;us not observed in F^. 

 The segregation shewn in (e), (/), {(j) and {h) is similar to that in 

 Table XI (a), Table XIII, Table XII, and Table XI (yS), respectively. 



