19H 



Martini. W.-L. 



Ae'des cantans Mg Ochlerotatus cantans Mg. 



abfitchii Felt excrucians Wlk. 



quartus Martini ? 



dorsalis Mg caspius Pallas. 



rusticus Rossi diuersus Theob. 



vexans Mg vexans Mg. 



lutescens Fbr lutescens Fabr. 



ornatus Mg. . . . Finlaya geniculata Oliv. 



rostochiensis Martini prodotes Dyar. 



? annulipes Zett. 



curriei Coquillet. 



Culex pipiens L C. pipiens L. 



territans Walker 



nigritulus Zett. 



Theobaldia annulata Schrank T. annulata Schrank. 



glaphyroptera Schiner. 



morsitans Theob. Culiseta morsitans Theob. 



f'umipennis Steph 



Mansonia Richardii Fie Tceniorhynchus Richardi. Fie. 



It is of particular interest that the whole new mosquito fauna which I have 

 detected here in Denmark has now also been found in Germany; MARTINI menti- 

 ons five species: A. lateralis Mg. A. quartus n. sp. C. territans Wlk., T. glaphyroptera 

 Schiner and T. fumipennis Steph. which we have not found here in Denmark. Of 

 these species A. lateralis Mg. and A. quartus n. sp. are most probably very doubtful 

 species; this especially holds good for the first named. In our country we only 

 lack C. territans, T. glaphyroptera and fumipennis. T. glaphyroptera cannot be expected 

 in our country, but there is no doubt that the two others will be found. Most prob- 

 ably C. territans is in some way concealed in my forest races of C. pipiens, but provi- 

 sionally the larva does not allow this supposition. That I have not found T. fumi- 

 pennis must be regarded as simply accidental. 



On the other hand my list includes three species which are lacking in that 

 of MARTINI. These three species are 0. annulipes Zett. 0. curriei Coc. and nigritulus 

 Theob. All these species are doubtful; I am not quite sure that what I have named 

 O. annulipes Zett. can be kept distinct from O. excrucians; still the larvae do not 

 coincide. 0. curriei is perhaps identic with O. caspius Pall.; the larva being un- 

 known; what the species determined as C. nigritulus really is, we do not know with 

 certainty; most probably it is related to C. territans but the larvae seem to differ 

 very much from each other. 



With regard to the synonymy in the two lists this may be regarded as rather 

 indisputable in most of the cases; there are only two cases to which it is neces- 



