Eiidence from Protorioana 



.'580 



tliat the transforming cyto])la.sniic substance is not activdv 

 participating in the transformation? After what lias lum 

 said in the preceding pages, the reader will not (i(nil)t what 



FIGURE 33. EPIMERTTE OF BELOIDES FIRMUS (aFTER TAXKESTER). 



the author's reply is to this query. The activity of tlie nu- 

 cleus would furnish no evidence whatever for a denial. 

 As bearing on the question of whether tlie development 



FIOITRE 33. EPIMERTTE OF COMEI.OIDES CRl VITUS ( AFTER TANKESTEh). 



of the epimerite of gregarines can rightly be regardrti as 

 an exhibition of heredity, I present in figures ^^8 to :i^,J, il 

 lustrations of the great variety of form of this organ in 



N 



