Figures 3.29 CIMIS ET^, and measured and calculated daily evaporation 

 from Peck floating evaporation pans with different sahnities 

 using the ET^ correction factor. 

 Figures 3.30 Cumulative CIMIS ET„, and measured and calculated daily 

 evaporation from Peck floating evaporation pans with 

 different salinities using the ET^ correction factor. 

 Figure 4.1 Wind coefficient in relation to wind speed. 



Figure 4.2 Calculated evaporation rate from pure water as well as from 



saline water (EC =14 dS/m) compared to the measured rate 

 from the saline floating evaporation pan at Peck pond, for the 

 period August 19-20, 1989. 

 Figure 4.3 Calculated evaporation rate from pure water as well as from 



saline water (EC =14 dS/m) compared to the measured rate 

 from the saline floating pan at Peck pond, for the period 

 August 19-20, 1989 (different data comparison). 

 Figure 4.4 Calculated evaporation rate from pure water as well as from 



saline water (EC =14 dS/m) compared to the measured rate 

 from the saline floating pan at Peck pond, for the period 

 August 19-20, 1989 (partially excluded data). 

 Figure 4.5 Evaporation in relation to vapor pressure difference between 



air and water surface at a wind speed of 2 miles per hour 

 (Moore and Runkles, 1968). 

 Figure 4.6 Evaporation in relation to vapor pressure difference between 



air and water surface at a wind speed of 6 miles per hour 

 (Moore and Runkles, 1968). 

 Figure 4.7 Relative evaporation rate [Evaporation from a saline solution 



to that of evaporation from distilled water (E/E^)] in relation 

 to wind speed and salt concentration at an air temperature of 

 76°F and 60% relative humidity (Moore and Runkles, 1968). 

 Figure 4.8 Relative evaporation rate [Evaporation from a saline solution 



to that of evaporation from distilled water (EVE^)] in relation 

 to wind speed and salt concentration at an air temperature of 

 76°F and 80% relative humidity (Moore and Runkles, 1968). 

 Figure 4.9 Effect of specific gravity on evaporation of brine (L. J. Turk, 



1970). 

 Figure 6.1. Formulae for calculating predicted concentrations during 



evapoconcentration. 

 Figure 6.2. Conditions necessary for Time-Dependent ECF calculations. 

 Figure 6.3. Results of TD-ECF Calculation for Pryse Cell 2 SE using 



multiple final dates. 

 Figure 6.4 Predicted and observed concentrations of arsenic and 



selenium for (from leff to right) Barbizon, Peck and Pryse 

 evaporation ponds. The TDECF method is used. 

 Figure 6.5 Predicted and observed concentrations of boron and 



molybdenum for (from left to right) Barbizon, Peck and Pryse 

 evaporation ponds. The TDECF method is used. 

 Figure 6.6 Predicted and observed concentrations of arsenic, selenium, 



boron and molybdenum for Peck evaporation pond. The 

 MCECF method is used. 

 Figure 7.1 Trace elements associated with evaporites from evaporation 



ponds. 



page 1.7 



