List of Figures 



Figure 1.1 Areas of Shallow Groundwater 



Figure 2.1 Ternary diagrams of the relative concentrations of major 



cations and anions in evaporation pond waters (meq/1 basis). 

 Figure 3.1 Weather monitoring equipment set-up. 



Figure 3.2 March Diurnal Study: Pryse (Water Sample Analysis). 



Figure 3.3 March Diurnal Study: Barbizon (Water Sample Analysis). 



Figure 3.4 March Diurnal Study: Peck 3 NW (Water Sample Analysis). 



Figure 3.5 March Diurnal Study: Peck 5 SW (Water Sample Analysis). 



Figure 3.6 March Diurnal Study: Pryse (Weather Monitoring). 



Figure 3.7 March Diurnal Study: Peck (Weather Monitoring). 



Figure 3.8 March Diurnal Study: Barbizon (Weather Monitoring). 



Figure 3.9 August Diurnal Study: Pryse (Water Sample Analysis). 



Figure 3.10 August Diurnal Study: Barbizon (Water Sample Analysis). 

 Figure 3.11 August Diurnal Study: Peck 1 NW (Water Sample Analysis). 

 Figure 3.12 August Diurnal Study: Peck BS (Water Sample Analysis). 

 Figure 3.13 August Diurnal Study: Peck SP (Water Sample Analysis). 

 Figure 3.14 August Diurnal Study: Pryse (Weather Monitoring). 

 Figure 3.15 August Diurnal Study: Barbizon (Weather Monitoring). 

 Figure 3.16 August Diurnal Study: Peck (N^'eather Monitoring). 

 Figure 3.17 Daily evaporation in relation to the salinity level in Peck 



floating evaporation pans and ET^ during the given dates in 



September, 1989. 

 Figure 3.18 Trend of daily evaporation in relation to the salinity level in 



Peck floating evaporation pans and ET^ for the given dates in 



September, 1989. 

 Figure 3.19 Trend of daily evaporation in relation to the salinity level in 



Peck evaporation floating evaporation pans and ET^ for the 



period Sept. 1 through Sept. 9, 1989. 

 Figure 3.20 Trend of daily evaporation in relation to the salinity level in 



Peck floating evaporation pans and ET^ for the period Sept. 1 



through Sept. 9, 1989. 

 Figure 3.21 Cumulative evaporation in relation to the salinity level in 



Peck floating evaporation pans and ET^ for the period Sept. 1 



through Sept. 9, 1989. 

 Figure 3.22 Effect of air temperature on hourly ET^ and average 



evaporation rates from Peck floating evaporation pans (EC = 



14 dS/m) for the period August 19-20, 1989. 

 Figure 3.23 Effect of solar radiation on hourly ET^ and average 



evaporation rates from Peck floating evaporation pans (EC = 



14 dS/m) for the period August 19-20, 1989. 

 Figure 3.24 Effect of Relative Humidity on hourly ET__ and average 



evaporation rates from Peck floating evaporation pans (EC = 



14 dS/m) for the period August 19-20, 1989. 

 Figure 3.25 Effect of wind speed on hourly ET^ sind average evaporation 



rates from Peck floating evaporation pans (EC = 14 dS/m) for 



the period August 19- 20, 1989. 

 Figure 3.26 Effect of vapor pressure on hourly ET^^ and average 



evaporation rates from Peck floating evaporation pans (EC = 



14 dS/m) for the period August 19- 20, 1989. 

 Figure 3.27 AverEige daily evaporation from 14 dS/m Peck floating 



evaporation pans for four months in 1989. 

 Figure 3.28 Regression of ET correction factor on EC of drainage water. 



page 1.6 



