The .s])('rinipns collorlod by nie, of whuli llic opposite fif^urr reprpsenls ;in illiislni- 

 lioii, differ ratlier imicii from Komarow s draugiits of this species in <!).i, Miiiii.M-,i;yiiiii III 

 (1907) t. IN', f. 11. I'luis. the leaves in my .specimens are always more or less distinctly 

 pelioled: tiie lower haves aic tjenerally more long-petioled than the upper ones, and even 

 if the petiole is sliorl. it can he (listinclly poiiilcd out. The leaves are also compara- 

 tively narrower, on an average 0,5 — 0.8 cm. hroad. and 15 I tin. long, almost equally 

 hroad or gradually ta])eiing upwards, rounded or suljohtuse at the summit, while the leaves 

 in the said drawing of Kom.\iu)\v's are of a quite different shape, viz. ovale — oblong, 

 cuneately tapering towards the base, and acuminate at the apex. The upper sides of the 



I 



Fig. 104. Sculellarici sconUi/olia Fischeh. a. P'lower. — b. Upper 

 lip, expanded. — c. Lower tip, expanded ,ca. ='.Wi). 



leaves are glabrous, the margins and the nerves of the under sides distinctly pubescent 

 and glandular, glabrous for the rest. The flowers are shoil-pedicelled, the pedicels gene- 

 rally only a few mm. long, and the corolla-tube is in all the specimens collected distinct- 

 ly rectangularly curved at the base, while Komarow's specimens — to judge from the 

 drawing — have the corolla-tubes straight The calyx, and especially the corolla-tube 

 and the upper lip are puberulent and glandulous. The lower lip is glabrous, larger, and 

 farther projecting than the upper ones, while the lower lip in the drawing quoted is 

 small, undivided, and shorter. Thus, it will appear that my specimens differ rather con- 

 siderably from those figured and described by Kom.\ro\v from Manchooria, but they 



373 



