was proved in this ease. The plot sprayed with liquid lime-sulfur throughout the 

 spraying season beginning with the pink appUcation produced a shghtly smaller 

 percentage of scabby apples than did the plot which received Bordeaux mixture at 

 the prepink and pink applications followed by liquid lime-sulfur for the calyx and 

 fourth summer spray. 



We have no evidence at either of these orchards that Bordeaux mixture is pref- 

 erable to Ume-sulfur for the prepink and pink apphcations. The labor involved 

 in preparing Bordeaux mixture is sufficient to swing the scale against it in the 

 absence of more evidence in its favor. 



Dr. 0. R. Butler states (in correspondence) that in his experiments in New 

 Hampshire in 1922 where a spray schedule of Ume-sulfur alone was followed, there 

 was 67.5 per cent scabby fruit; while the substitution of Bordeaux mixture for 

 the pink apphcation reduced the amount to 49.2 per cent. Ki-out (2) reports 

 that in the Sabine orchard in 1922 the substitution of Bordeaux mixture for Ume- 

 sulfur at the pink appUcation did not reduce the percentage of scabby fruit, as 

 compared with results foUowing the use of Ume-sulfur alone; in fact, in the case 

 of both dry and Uquid Ume-sulfur, when Bordeaux mixture was substituted there 

 was a larger percentage of scab. At the Knights and the Frost orchards, how- 

 ever, there was a sUght decrease in the amount of scab when Bordeaux mixture 

 w^as substituted for the pink appUcation; in the case of Uquid Ume-sulfur this 

 decrease was from 4 to 2 per cent in one orchard and 2 to per cent in another, 

 and in the case of dry Ume-sulfur the decrease was from 8 to 3 per cent in one 

 orchard and 2 to 1 per cent in another. We may conclude that although Bordeaux 

 mixture under some conditions may prove sUghtly superior to Ume-sulfur for the 

 pink spray, there is, nevertheless, abundant evidence of the completely satis- 

 factory control of apple scab by Ume-sulfur throughout the spraying season; and 

 it does not appear, therefore, that we have sufficient reason to devote extra labor 

 to the preparation of Bordeaux mixture. 



Atomic Sulphur. 



The proprietary sulfur fungicide, Atomic Sulphur, was used in two orchards 

 with a view to comparing it with lime-sulfur for its fungicidal efficiency and its 

 toxicity to the sprayed tree. Enough of this material to make 100 gallons costs 

 more than three times as much as the Uquid Ume-sulfur necessary to make an 

 equal amount. Atomic Sulphur, therefore, needs to show very decided advantages 

 over Ume-sulfur if it is to compete with it in the sprajdng of apples. 



There was this year no injury to fruit or foliage on trees sprayed with Ume- 

 sulfur or with Atomic Sulphur. It was, therefore, impossible to compare them as 

 regards toxicity to the spra5'-ed tree. 



Mason (16) found that when apple trees were sprayed with a combination 

 Atomic Sulphur-lime-lead arsenate spray, the foliage was uninjured, while under 

 the same cUmatic conditions, foliage and fruit were burned by the Ume-sulfur-lead 

 arsenate combination. 



Atomic Sulphur was used by the WTiter at the rate of 7 pounds to 50 gaUons 

 of water, and when it was used in combination with arsenate of lead, 4 pounds of 

 lime slaked into a milk were added to each 50 gallons, as directed by the manu- 

 facturers. At one of the orchards, the results were as follows: Atomic Sulphur, 

 4.2 per cent scabby fruit; Uquid Ume-suKur 2.1 per cent scabby fruit; dry Ume- 

 sulfur 4-50, 1.03 per cent scabby fruit. At this orchard, the control secured by 

 Atomic Sulphur was somewhat surpassed by both dry Ume-sulfur and Uquid Ume- 

 sulfur. At the other orchard, the percentages of scabby fruit were as follows : Atomic 

 Sulphur, 3.9 per cent; dry Ume-sulfur 3-50, 4.6 per cent. At this orchard also, 

 the results with the two materials are very nearly alike. 



If Atomic Sulphur has any advantages over lime-suKur, they are not to be found 

 in relative efficiency in scab control, but rather in degrees of difference in toxicity 

 to the sprayed plant. Apple orchards in which peaches are planted as fillers are 

 sometimes sprayed with Atomic Sulphur because of the known danger to peaches 

 in leaf from the use of commercial Ume-sulfur. When this is done, we may be 

 sure that the apples have received treatment with a fungicide which can protect 

 them against scab infection. 



