SEATS. 81 



you hold it, and perhaps knock you down if you hold it 

 quite clear, or at least knock the wind out of you. If 

 a man sits in the right place he does not need to rise 

 in his stirrups for any such purpose ; and if he does not, 

 the rising in the stirrups, and thereby abandoning his 

 whole seat, may or may not help him. 



Perhaps we should never have attempted writing a 

 single line about the hunting seat but for one considera- 

 tion it is this : The majority of our cavalry, yeomanry, 

 and mounted volunteers are hunting men, and if there 

 really were such an enormous difference between a 

 good cavalry and a good hunting seat, as many people 

 seem to suppose, it would be simply a very hopeless case. 

 But is there this great difference ? Mr. Apperley says, 

 " Be assured that the military seat with very long 

 stirrups will not do here, however graceful it may appear 

 on a parade." Fortunately this great authority gives us 

 in his own book a drawing intended to represent this 

 graceful seat, which (see Plate V.), on closer inspection, 

 turns out to be Harry Lorrequer's " tongs across a wall." 

 Well, no doubt, this won't do for hunting, nor indeed, 

 as far as we can see, for any other good purpose beyond 

 exhibiting the high polish of a man's boots, spurs, and 

 stirrup irons the rider being in uniform scarcely 

 making his seat a good military one ; but of this more 

 anon. Mr. Apperley has, however, given us two other 

 figures representing his notions of good and bad hunting 

 seats, which are here presented to the reader. 



On the other hand, there can be no doubt of the 

 total inapplicability of the wash-ball seat to military 

 purposes ; and, after all, one comes to the conclusion 

 that the essential difference between any two good forms 

 of seat is not so enormous as is commonly represented. 



