CENT. VI. 83 



565, Cotinas elliplicus Raf. ramis striatis, 

 petiolis brevis marginatis, fol. ellipt. utrinque ob- 

 tusis, paniculis non plumosis. Mts. of Tyrol, 

 Carniolia, Sibiria and Qrigon? leaves larger 

 than in others often triuncial, panicle of many 

 large flowers, seldom plumose. 



566, SUMACUS copallina Raf. Rhus do O. 

 well known sp, to which Torrey has mixt 2 

 new ones, S. montana and floridana. This 

 has twigs verrucose, few entire leaflets acumi- 

 nate &c &c New Jersey &c. 



567, Sumacus montana Raf. differs by fo- 

 lioles unequaly serrate &c Allegh. Mts. The 

 bad name of Rhus must be discarded, and we 

 shall have instead Cotinus, Sumacus, Philoste- 

 mon, Lobadium, Thezera, Metopium,Cominia, 

 Festania, Malosma and Lilit/na Raf. (10 sta- 

 mens) all good genera, see my revision. 



PHILOSTEMON Raf. fl. lud. p. 107, dif- 

 fers from Sumacus by flowers dioical, calix ur- 

 ceolate Sdent. petals reflexed, stigma one, fruit 

 u-mbilicate (in all ?) leaves ternate, *2 folioles 

 sessile obliqual middle petiolate, fl. racemose 

 not paniculate. 



568, Philostemon toxicodendron R. Rhus 

 do. L. O. frutescens pubens, ramulis teretis 

 punctatis, foliolis ovatis obovatisque, subangula- 

 tis, acutis, petiolis longissimis striatis, drupis 

 globosis glabris fuscatis N. Amer. Torrey has 

 blended 3 or 4 species with it as usual. 



569, Philogt. radicans R. Rhus do L. O. 

 sepe scandens radicans glabrum, ramnlis stria- 

 tis, petiolis longis semiteres, foliolis ovatis acu- 

 minatis integris, drupis glabris fuscatis now 

 properly distinguished from last. 



570, Pkilost. lutescens Raf. an Ph. radicans 

 fl. lud. 354? scandens, ramis angulatis verruco- 



