Hydrophyllaceae 



von 



A. Brand. 



(Gedruckt im Herbst 1912.) 



[Pars Borraginearum et Comohulorum Juss. Gen. ed. 4. (1789) 4 28 et 4 34, ed. 2. 

 (1791) 144 et 149. — Ordo distinctus sine nomine R. Br. Prodr. Fl. Nov. Holland. 

 (1810) 492. — Hydrophylleae R. Br. in Edw. Bot. Reg. III. (1817) t. 242 et in Bot. 

 Magaz. L. (1823) sub tab. 2373; Bartling, Ord. nat. (1830) 195; Bentb. in Trans. 

 Linn. Soc. XVII. (1834) 272; Endl. Gen. (1836 — 1840) 658. — Hydrophyllaceae Lindl. 

 Nat. Syst. Bot. ed. 2 (1836) 271; A. DC. in DC. Prodr. IX. (18 45) 287 et 564; 

 Bentb. et Hook. f. Gen. II. (1876) 825; A. Gray, Syn. Fl. Nortb-America II. 1 (1878) 

 152; Peter in Engl. u. Prantl, Pflzfam. IV. 3a. (1892) 54; Dalla Torre et Harms, 

 Gen. Siph. (1904) 423. — Hydroleae R. Br. Observ. syst. Congo (1818) 32; Bart- 

 ling, Ord. nat. (1830) 189. — Hydroleaceae Choisy in Mem. Soc. Phys. Geneve VI. 

 (1833) 106; Lindl. Introduct. ed. 2. (1835) 234; Endl. Gen. (1836 — 1840) 660; Choisy 



in DC. Prodr. X. (1846) 4 79]. 



Wichtigste Literatur. Choisy, Description des Hydroleacees, in Mem. Soc. Phys. 

 Geneve VI. (1833) 95 — 122; Note additioneile in Ann. Soc. Nat. 2 ser. I. (1834) 

 179 — 181. — Bentham, Review of the Order of Hydrophylleae, in Trans. Linn. Soc. 

 XVII. (gelesen 1834, gedruckt 1837) 267 — 282. — A. De Candolle, Hydrophyllaceae 

 in DC. Prodr. IX. (1845) 287—301; Hydroleaceae? 1. c. X. (1846) 588 u. 589. — 

 Choisy, Hydroleaceae in DC. Prodr. X. (1846) 179 — 185. — Harvey, Description 

 of a new Genus of Hydrophyllaceae, in Hook. Lond. Journ. Bot. V. (1846) 311. — 

 Bennett, Review of the Genus Hydrolea, with descriptions of three New Species, in Journ. 

 Linn. Soc. XI. (1869) 266—279; Hydroleaceae in Fl. brasil. VII. (1871) 391—398. — 

 Watson, Bot. King (187 1) 248 — 259. — A. Gray, A conspectus of the North American 

 Ilillrophyllaceae, in Proceed. Amer. Acad. X. (1875) 312 — 332; Hydrophyllaceae in Syn. 

 Fl. IL 4. (1878) 152—176; Suppl. (1886) 413—420. — Bentham et Hooker f. 

 Gen. IL (4 876) 825 — 831. — A. Gray, Nama in Hemsley, Botany of Biologia centrali- 

 americana II. (1881 — 1882) 360—366. — M.E.Jones, Note on Tricardia, in Bull. 

 Torrey Bot. Club IX. (1882) 116. — Greene, Studies in the Botany of California and 

 parts adjacent, in Bull. California Acad. Sei. I. 4 (4 885) 4 99. — Baillon, Recon- 

 stitution de la famille des Borraginacees, in Bull. Soc. Linn. Paris CIV. (4 890) 828 — 831; 

 Sur 1' Elisiophyllum, in Bull. Soc. Linn. Paris CHI. (1890) 817 — 818. — Peter, Hydro- 

 pliyUaccae, in Engl. u. Prantl, Pflzfam. IV. 3a (1892) 54 — 71. — Coville in Contrib. 

 St Nat. Herb. IV. (1893) 156 — 162. — Bioletti, Notes on the genus Xemophila, 

 in Erythea III. (1895) 139 — 142. — Parish, Southern California Forms of Phacelia 

 'in innata Jacq., in Zoe V. (1900) 9. — Howell, Hydrophyllaceae in A Flora of North- 

 west America I. (1904) 463 — 474. — Jepson, Hydrophyllaceae in A Flora of Western 

 Middle California (4904) 432 — 440. — Eastwood, Some small-flowered Species of 

 Xmophila from the Paciüc Coast, in Bull. Torr. Bot. Club. XXVIII. (1904) 437—460; 

 New species of Xemophila from the Pacific Coast 1. c. XXIX. (4 902) 47 4—474. — 

 Chandler, Arevision of the genus Xemophila, in Bot. Gaz. XXXIV. (4902) 494—245. — 



A. Engler, Das Pflanzenreich. IV. (Embrjrophyta siphonogama) 251. \ 



