new Species of Butterflies and Moths. 489 
touching each side of it: hind wings daiker, with a distorted 
whitish middle band, its centre part large and running 
upwards in an angle, its lower portion narrowing to tlie 
middle of the abdominal margin. Head and body above 
concolorous with the wings. Wings beneath greyish white, 
shining, the outer areas darker: fore wings with a black 
spot in the middle of the cell, one at the end, and another 
beyond it, adjoining a whitish spot which reaches the costa: 
hind wing with a short blackish discal band from the costa, 
and another more outwards below it. Body and legs white, 
a brown spot on the knee, and another at the base of the 
tarsus, 
Expanse of wings 14 inch. 
Hab. Padang, Sumatra. 
With a superficial resemblance to L. poltisalis, Walker. 
Lygropia nictoalis, nov. 
2. Palpi chocolate-brown, the first and second joints 
white beneath. Wings of a uniform dark purplish brown of 
the same shade of colour as L. flavispila, Swinhoe, described 
in this Journal (ser. 6, vol. xiv. p. 204, 1894) from the 
Khasia Hllls, which it somewhat resembles: fore wings with 
a white spot at the end of the cell, a white discal band from 
the costa to vein 4, a minute white dot below it, and a spot 
near the hinder margin a little beyond its middle: hind wings 
with a white transverse band a little before the middle, from 
the costa, narrowing hindwards to the abdominal margin and 
bent slightly inwards at vein 2. -Underside pale purplish 
shining grey, markings as on the upperside ; a fine whitish 
marginal thread on both wings. Head and body above con- 
colorous with the wings ; abdomen with fine white segmental 
bands; the face, body beneath, and legs are pure white. 
Expanse of wings, 2, 1 inch. 
Hab. Padang, Sumatra. 
Prwactin2. 
Euglyphis procopia graphica, nov. 
3 @. In Ann. & Mag. Nat. Hist. (7) xvii. p. 290 (1906), 
I named the Indian form as falsalis, on account of its dis- 
tinctive differences from specimens I have trom Fergusson 
Isiand, which I wrongly supposed to be the same as Cramer’s 
species from Amboina. Now that I have received the true 
procopta from Amboina, I find that they differ materially 
