A HISTORY OF DORSET 



Salisbury by the empress.^' Edward's manor of Canford (which may be presumed to 

 include Kinson, since they were valued together in 1086) belonged to the fee of Salis- 

 bury' in 1212.-*° The lands of Ernulf of Hesdin appear to have passed in the main to 

 Patrick de Chaworth, his son-in-law.'*' In 1242-3 Patrick's descendant of the same 

 name held 4^ knights' fees in Dorset,'*^ which can be regarded as proof that he held 

 some of Ernulf 's manors, although none is named. At the same date, however, Ernulf 's 

 largest manor, Kington, belonged to the honor of the Earl of Salisbury.-*^ It appears to 

 have been part of the marriage portion of Earl Patrick's mother, Sybil, Patrick de 

 Chaworth's daughter. In a note to the carta which Pain de Mundubleil, Patrick de 

 Chaworth's grandson, submitted in 11 66, it is stated that Patrick, Earl of Salisbury-, 

 then held 20 fees de matrimonio matris suae, presumably in the main manors which had 

 belonged to Ernulf in Gloucestershire.-*-* 



The lands of Turstin fitz Rolf passed to Wynebald de Ballon+5 whose grandson, 

 Henry of Neufmarche, returned a carta in 1 166.-*^ Henry's second son and eventual heir 

 James died leaving two daughters between whom the barony was divided. Isabel 

 married Ralph Russel and Hawise married twice, her second husband being Nicholas 

 de Moels.-*7 In 1242-3 Ralph Russel and Nicholas de Moels held i6.f knights' fees in 

 Dorset.48 One of Ralph Russel's manors was AUington,-*' which Turstin had held in 

 1086. It seems reasonable to assume that Waleran fitz William, who in 11 30 rendered 

 account for the dues of the New Forest, 5° was in some way related to Waleran the 

 huntsman. Waleran fitz William is almost certain to be the father of Walter Waleram 

 {sic) who accounted for the New Forest dues in 11565' and returned a carta in 1166.52 

 Three of his knights, Julian de Manestone, John de Vifhida, and Thomas de Wintre- 

 burne, may reasonably be supposed to have derived their surnames from the manors of 

 Manston, Fifehead Neville, and Wintreburne, which were held by Waleran the huntsman 

 in 1086. Walter Waleran died in 1200-1, leaving as his heirs three daughters. Cecily 

 married John de Monmouth, who in 1236 held Manston, Maiden Newton, and Sutton 

 Waldron, which Waleran held in 1086.53 Joan married William de Neville and in 1235-6 

 held Winterborne and Fifehead, 5-* and in the same year Henry de Tore held i fee in 

 Toller of Aubrey de Botreaux, the third sister.55 John de Monmouth, son and heir of 

 Cecily and her husband, died without issue, and Sutton Waldron passed to William de 

 St. Martin, heir of Joan de Neville by her second husband. 56 



Of William of Movon's eleven manors in Dorset nine can be traced in the possession 

 of the family of Mohun in the 13th century. In 1235-6 Reynold de Mohun held 

 Hammoon, Chelborough, Little Windsor, Mapperton, and Chilfrome, Steepleton 

 Iwerne, which has been identified as the Domesday manor of Weme or Iwerna (nos. 281 

 and xci), and Cruxton, identified as the Domesday manor of Frame or Froma (nos. 279 

 and lxxxix).57 Winterborne was part of the inheritance of Alice, Reynold's wife, and 

 passed to his son John, when it was known as Winterborne Houghton. 5^ John also held 

 Todber.59 Serle of Burcy's heir was his daughter Geva, who married first Martin and 



3" Round, Geoffrey de Mandeiille, 271. " Red Bk. Exch. (Rolls Ser.), 241-2. 

 ■"> Bk. of Fees, 90! *' V.C.H. Wilts, ii. no. s^ Qur. Reg. R. ix. 173; Pipe R. 1202 (P.R.S. N.s. xv), 



■•^ Bk. of Fees, 755 (Som. and Dors, return). 126; Bk. of Fees, 425-6. 



" Ibid. 753. " Bk. of Fees, 425, 426. 



■" Red Bk. Exch. (Rolls Ser.), 241, 298. " Ibid. 427. In the same year Walter Walerand held i 



•" Round, Studies in Peerage, 189 sqq. fee in Toller; ibid. 426. 



■"' Red Bk. Exch. (Rolls Ser.), 296. None of Turstin's -"' Ex. e Rot. Fin. (Rec. Com.), ii. 41, 392; Cal. Inq. 



Dorset manors can be identified here. p. m. i, pp. loi, 166. 



■" Sanders, Eng. Baronies, 68. '' Bk. of Fees, 424, 426. For the identifications, see 



*^ Bk. of Fees, 751. No manors are mentioned by name. A. Fagersten, Place-Names of Dorset, 57, 233. 



■•' Ibid. 425. 58 g^ gj Pees, 401 (partition of fees of William Bri- 



5° Pipe R. 1 1 30 (Rec. Com.), 17. werre). 



" Ibid. 1 156-8 (Rec. Com.), 56. " Cal. Inq. p. m. ii, pp. 178, 179. 



58 



