A HISTORY OF SUSSEX 



sick those who were well should nurse them if 

 so ordered by the warden on pain of expulsion. 84 

 Between 1815 and 1835 the warden's income 

 averaged within a few pence of ^170, and that 

 of each inmate was over j3O. 86 A further 

 1,000 of stock was left to the hospital by 

 Mr. Baker in i840. 86 



WARDENS OF THE HOSPITAL OF ST. MARY, 

 CHICHESTER 87 



Henry, occurs 1230 88 



Walter, occurs 1248 "-63 w 



Robert de Kyngeston, occurs I2J2 S1 and 



1279^ 



Gilbert, occurs 1285 93 

 Walter, occurs ia88 94 

 Gilbert, occurs I298 95 

 Richard le Orfevre, appointed 1 30 1, 96 occurs 



I304 97 



William de Selebourne, occurs 1316" 

 Thomas, occurs 1343" 

 Alan de Leverton, appointed 1385 10 

 Walter Forey, exchanged 1389 101 

 John Courderay, appointed i^8g 102 

 John Ayleston, occurs 1412 lu3 

 John Croucher, resigned 1447 104 

 John Goswell, appointed I447 10 

 John Champion, 14/5 

 Ivo Darrell, occurs 1478 106 

 William Fleshmonger, 1525 

 John Champion, occurs I528, 107 1535 108 

 John Worthyall, 1537, occurs 1542 109 

 John Peterston, B.D., 1554 

 William Pye, 1555 

 George Beaumont, D.D., 1558 



81 Suss. Arch. Co/I, xxiv, 60. M Ibid. 61. 



86 An account of all the property held by the 

 hospital in 1835 ' s given in Rep. of Charity Com. 

 650-8. 



87 When other references are not given, the autho- 

 rity for the names and dates of admission is the list 

 compiled by Mr. W. B. B. Freeland, for a copy of 

 which I am indebted to Canon Deedes. 



88 Feet ofF. (Suss. Rec. Soc.), No. 226. 

 * Ibid. No. 482. 



90 Feet of F. Suss, file 24, No. 30. 



" Ibid, file 28, No. 2. 



" Assize R. 922, m. 20. 



83 Feet of F. Suss, file 32, No. iz. 



94 Assize R. 929, m. 46^. 



94 Mins. Accts. 1022, No. 2. 



M Wright, op. cit. 2 1 . 



" Assize R. 1330, m. 20. 



98 Ibid. 938, m. 55. 



99 Pat. i/'Edw. Ill, pt. i, m. 39^. 

 00 Pat. 8 Ric. II, pt. ii, m. 7. 



101 Cant. Archiepis. Reg. Courtenay, fol. 272}. 

 " Ibid. 



103 Cat. Papal Let. vi, 3 1 8. 



104 Wright, op. cit. 27. Ios Ibid. 

 106 Chich. Epis. Reg. Story, fol. 10. 



07 Wright, op. cit. 34. 



08 Valor Eccl. (Rec. Com.), ii, 305. 



"* Chanc. Proc. (ser. ii), bdle. I, No. 42. 



Hugh Turnbull, D.D., 1559 



Edmund Weston, LL.B., 1567 



William Overton, D.D., 1570 



Richard Kitson, B.D., 1580 



Randoll Barlow, 1585 



Francis Cox, D.D., 1602 



Hugh Perrin, 1606 



Henry Challen, 1610 



Humphrey Booth, M.A., 1613 



Bruno Ryves, 1660 



Oliver Whitby, D.D., 1666 



Henry Edes, D.D., 1679 



William Hayley, D.D., 1703 



Edmund Gibson, D.D., 1715 



John Wright, M.A., 1717 



Thomas Hayley, D.D., 1720 



Thomas Sherlock, D.D., 1723 



William Sherwin, M.A., 1728 



Thomas Gooch, D.D., 1735 



Thomas Ball, M.A., 1738 



William Clarke, M.A., 1754 



Thomas Hurdis, D.D., 1770 



John Frankland, M.A., 1772 



Charles Harward, M.A., 1778 



John Courtail, M.A., 1784 



Combe Miller, M.A., 1806 



Moses Toghill, M.A., 1814 



Charles Webber, M.A., 1825 



Thomas Baker, M.A., 1828 



Charles Edward Hutchinson, 1829 



Charles Webber, junr., 1832 



George Shiffher, 1837 



Charles Webber, junr., 1849 



Charles Edward Hutchinson, 1850 



Charles Pilkington, 1864 



Charles Anthony Swainson, D.D., 1870 



John Russell Walker, M.A., 1882 



Thomas Francis Crosse, D.C.L., 1889 



Josiah Sanders Teulon, M.A., 1889 



James Hoare Masters, M.A., 1902 



The thirteenth-century seal is a pointed oval ; 

 the Virgin seated on a carved throne, with 

 crown, the Child, with nimbus, on the left knee. 

 In the field, on the left a star of six points between 

 two crescents, each enclosing a roundle ; on the 

 right a crescent enclosing a roundle between two 

 stars. 110 Legend : 



l^i SIGILL' : HOSPITALIS : SCE : MARIE : 

 CICESTRIE. 



37. THE HOSPITAL OF 'LODDiS- 

 DOWN,' CHICHESTER 



According to Dallaway, 111 the hospital ol 

 St. Mary Magdalen of Loddesdown was situated 

 at ' Maudlins ' Farm in West Hampnett ; this 

 seems probably correct, but he is apparently 

 wrong in saying that it was united with the 



110 B.M. xxxviii, 5 1 ; Suss. Arch. Coll. iii, 6. 



111 Hist, of West Suss, i (2), 122. 



102 



