182 



BOARD OF AGRICULTURE. [Pub. Doc. 



Table III. — Analysis of Milk taken from Possession of Producer 

 in Marhlehead, ready for Delivery to a Salem Peddler, April, 

 .7.90.9. 



Sample No. 



Fat. 



4.55 



Solids not 

 Fiit. 



8.25 



Total M,lk 

 Solids. 



12. 9G 

 11.00 



Refraction. 



39.5 

 40.0 



Note. — Sample No. 1 was taken from a full 8-qnart can and 

 Sample No. 2 from an S-qnai't can containing about 4 quarts of 

 milk. It is evident that in tlie attempt to mix the milk the top 

 of can No. 2 was tui'ned into can No. 1, thus making the contents 

 of No. 1 above and of No. 2 below the average quality of the herd's 

 milk. 



Analysis of Milk of Knoivn Purify taken from Herd of Above- 

 mentioned Producer, April, 1909 {Night's Milk). 



Note. — The above-mentioned animals were in extremely poor con- 

 dition, and the milk was thereafter excluded from the Salem market. 



Table IV. — Analyses of Two Samples of Milk taken in Colrain, 

 November, 1908, as it was about to be sent to a Creamery. 



Note. — Thei*e being no question but that Sample No. 1 con- 

 tained added water, the defendant was summoned into court, pleaded 

 guilty, and was fined $50, which he paid. 



