368 



983 HUMULUS LUPULUS. 



55 Leicester. Bloxam cat. 



56 Notts. 



57 Derby. Howitt cat. 



58 Chester ! f J.L. Warren cat. 



59 Lane. s. F. M. Webb cat.f 



60 west. Lintou cat. 



61 York s. east. 



62 n. east. Baker cat.f 



63 s. west. F. A. Lees cat. 



64 m. west. Tathaincat. 



65 n. west. Ward cat. 



66 Durham. " not native." 



67 Nor thumb. Storey cat.* 



68 Cheviot. Embleton cat.* 



69 Westmoreland ! f 



70 Cumberland! f Baker.* 



71 Man. Forbes cat. t "rare." 



72 Dumfries. Gray cat.* 



73 Kirkcudbright. Gray cat. 



75 Ayr. Duncan cat.f 



76 Eenfrew. Hennedy cat.t 



77 Lanark. Hennedy cat.* 



80 Eoxburgh. Duncan cat. 



81 Berwick. Border flo.* 

 83 Edinburgh! t Balf. cat.* 

 85 Fife. Lawson cat.f Balf.* 

 92 Aber. south ! * 



95 Elgin. Coll. Mor.* 



N.B. The Hop is generally re- 

 ported as a truly indigenous 

 plant in South England ; 

 but becoming much doubted, 

 or quite discarded as such, 

 in the northern counties. 



984 Ulnrns montana. 



Counties all, except 11 14 31 

 32 41 45 46 49 51 53 54 

 71 73 74 79 80 84 93 94 

 97 105 107 109 111 112. 

 And in several of the other 

 counties it is reported as 

 being uncertainly native or 

 certainly alien. 



985 Ulmus suberosa. 



N.B. It is found utterly impos- 

 sible to say in which of the 

 counties this much planted 

 tree is indigenous, and in 

 which of them it is simply 

 an introduction. The name 

 campestris, so frequent in 

 books, has sometimes in- 

 tended montana, but perhaps 

 more frequently this other 

 species. U. " suberosa " is 

 reported in counties 1 to 6 

 9 to 14 17 to 22 24 29 30 

 31 34 36 to 40 43 44 45 

 46 47 48 49 to 52 54 55 

 56 58 59 60 to 68 70 72 

 76 77 81 83 87 91. U. 

 " campestris " is reported in 

 counties 2 to 9 11 12 14 

 15 17 to 20 22 23 25 to 

 30 32 33 34 36 to 40 44 

 50 52 55 to 59 61 to 65 

 68. [77 80 81 83 90] . 



988 Quercus Robur. 



Counties all, except 71 74 75 

 79 105 107 109 to 112, 

 with the usual nine others. 

 This includes the two segre- 

 gates taken together under 

 the one name made more or 

 less common to both. They 

 are again enumerated in de- 

 tail below, as I find them 

 severally reported. But the 

 record is misleading nume- 

 rically, because " peduncu- 

 lata " is less frequently dis- 

 tinguished by name, as a 

 segregate from Robur, than 

 is the " sessili flora " ; this 

 latter being really less fre- 

 quent than the former. 



