CEKEBKAL STRUCTURE OF MAN AND THE APES. 135 



I redeemed that pledge by publishing, in the January number of the 

 Natural History Review for 1861, an article wherein the truth of the 

 three following propositions was fully demonstrated (I. c. p. 71) : 



" 1. That the third lobe is neither peculiar to, nor characteristic 

 of, man, seeing that it exists in all the higher quadrumana." 



" 2. That the posterior cornu of the lateral ventricle is neither 

 peculiar to, nor characteristic of, man, inasmuch as it also exists in 

 the higher quadrumana. 



" 3. That the hippocampus minor is neither peculiar to, nor char- 

 acteristic of, man, as it is found in certain of the higher quadru- 

 mana." 



Furthermore, this paper contains the following paragraph (p. 76) : 



" And lastly, Schroeder van der Kolk and Vrolik (op. cit. p. 271), 

 though they particularly note that ' the lateral ventricle is distin- 

 guished from that of Man by the very defective proportions of the 

 posterior cornu, wherein only a stripe is visible as an indication of 

 the hippocampus minor ; ' yet the Figure 4, in their second Plate, 

 shows that this posterior cornu is a perfectly distinct and unmistake- 

 able structure, quite as large as it often is in Man. It is the more 

 remarkable that Professor Owen should have overlooked the explicit 

 statement and figure of these authors, as it is quite obvious, on com- 

 parison of the figures, that his woodcut of the brain of a Chimpanzee 

 (1. c. p. 19) is a reduced copy of the second figure of Messrs. Schroe- 

 der van der Kolk and Vrolik's first Plate. 



" As M. Gratiolet (1. c. p. 18), however, is careful to remark, ' un- 

 fortunately the brain which they have taken as a model was greatly 

 altered (profondement affaisse), whence the general form of the brain 

 is given in these plates in a manner which is altogether incorrect.' 

 Indeed, it is perfectly obvious, from a comparison of a section of the 

 skull of the Chimpanzee with these figures, that such is the case ; 

 and it is greatly to be regretted that so inadequate a figure should 

 have been taken as a typical representation of the Chimpanzee's 

 brain." 



From this time forth, the untenability of his position might have 

 been as apparent to Professor Owen as it was to every one else ; but, 

 so far from retracting the grave errors into which he had fallen, 

 Professor Owen has persisted in and reiterated them ; first, in a lec- 

 ture delivered before the Royal Institution on the 19th of March, 

 1861, which is admitted to have been accurately reproduced in the 

 ' A thensDum ' for the 23rd of the same month, in a letter addressed 



