2. Medical Works, published by 
The articles are contributed by upwards of Sixty distinguished Writers, eminent in S« 
amongst whom the following may be enumerated :— = a ye 
Robert Adams, Esq. Dublin. John Goodsir, M.W.S. 
B. Alcock, M.B. Dublin. R. D. Grainger, Esq. 
W. P. Alison, M.D. F.R.S.E. R. E. Grant, M.D. F.R.S. L. & E. 
John Anderson, M.E.S W. A. Guy, M.D. ’ 
J. Apjohn, M.D. M.R.1.A. Marshall Hall, M.D. F.R.S. L, & E. 
Victor Audouin, M.D. Paris. Henry Hancock, 4,9 J. Reid, M.D. Edin! 
B. G. Babington, M.D. F.R.S. Robert Harrison, M.D. M.R.1.A. 
Thomas Bell, F.R.S. J Hart, M.D. M.R.I1.A. 
Charles Benson, M.D. M.R.1.A. A. nson, Esq. 
J. Bishop, Esq. 1 A St. Hilaire, M.D. Paris. 
John Bostock, M.D. V.P.R.S. Arthur Jacob, M.D. M.R.1.A, 
W. Bowman, Esq. George Johnson, M. 
W. T. Brande, F.R.S. T. Rymer Jones, ~~ 
J. E. Brenan, M.D. T. arton Jones, Esq. 
G. Breschet, M.D. Paris. T. Wilkinson King, Esq. 
W. B. Carpenter, M.D. Bristol. Samuel Lane, Esq. 
John Co! , M.D. Leith. F, T. Macd , Esq 
David Craigie, M.D. F.R.S.E. John 47 hes “4 
T. Blizard — “3 Robert Mayne, M.D. 
G. P. Deshayes, M.D. s W. A. Miller, M 
& Fakonn aD. rae | | Geng Newere Bon 
W. F. Edwards, M.D. F.R.S. Paris. | R. Owen, F.R.S. G.S. 
H. Milne Edwards, M.D. Paris, James Paget, Esq. 
Arthur Farre, M.B. F.R.S. 
—wn 
ee 
OPINIONS OF THE PRESS. ea 
«« The Cyclopedia of Anatomy and Physiology is unquestionably one of the best of the se 
works of the day . . . . Dr. Todd has learned to use the magic art by which men of most op 
pursuits have been associated in one common and brilliant task .... Few works have 
this country in which so large and distinguished an association of contributors have been 
If we wished for a means of estimating a man’s taste for his profession, we would ask, 
Cyclopedia grace his book-shelves?”—Lancet, August 22, 1840. “* 
« Considering the objects and plan of this work, the knowledge and ind of the ec 
splendid array of talent combined in its construction, and the elegant manner in which its mechi 
part is executed, we cannot but regard it as one of the most important and valuable ever produced 
this country.””— British and Foreign Medical Review. | 
ae 
“7 
a 
«« It gives us much pleasure to observe the steady progress of this valuable work. We con 
had our doubts on its first announcement, and even for some time after the of so’ me of | 
deserving of pd encouragement. So far from having exhausted its 
ment, and then fal 
to be rivalled in this or any other country of Europe.”— Medical Gazette. 
“* No diminution of energy, zeal, or talent, is visible in the progress of the 
beg to recommend it in an especial manner to the  abecieageee in consequence of the gr 
which is paid to Comparative Anatomy and Physiology—sciences which are now 
the name, and which are every year becoming more aot more cultivated, because 
light on the Anatomy and Physiology of the Human Body.* * * The execution shows 
Cyclopedia of Anatomy and heap be no hasty conception, and the complete success of the 
may be foretold, from the excellence which characterizes the portion of it already publishe 
Johnson's Medico-Chirw 
«* The most remarkable encyclopedia hitherto possessed by the medical sciences.” _ 
Repertorium fiir Anatomie und Physiologie, von‘ 
«« The Cyclopedia of Anatomy and Physiology, a work peculiar in this respect, . 
joint Pa oF Enelish and French contributors. The able Editors have the merit 
an example of breaking down national distinctions, which are injurious to science, and of 
the time when men of enlarged minds shall be considered as belonging to no particular cou 
as members of a universal republic. The memoirs which have already appeared in this 1 
likely to obtain the approbation of scientific men in both countries.” be 
Dr. Prichard’s Address to the Provincial Med. Assoc 
Cemaais 
Jp) ai. 
