ARISTOTLE 



by commentators, and made a number of con- 

 jectural emendations. 



(3) Arthur Piatt, in his translation of G.A. in the 

 Oxford Translations of Aristotle, published IQIO, 

 suggests a number of emendations, many of which 

 have been adopted in the present text ; and some 

 of these, again, I have found to be confirmed by 

 Scot's translation, though Piatt himself was un- 

 aware of this. Piatt also detected many corrupt 

 places and misplaced passages or interpolations. 



(4) Bitterauf himself puts forward about ten con- 

 jectural emendations in addition to his other 

 suggestions for improving the text, but few of 

 them are of major importance. 



A few suggestions for emendation were made by : 



(5) H. Bonitz," en passant, as asides to his treatment 

 of passages in other works of Aristotle, and by 



(6) H. Richards ** ; some of these will be found re- 

 corded in their proper places. 



Single small emendations are proposed by M. 

 Haydupk '^ and E. Zeller.'' A few are proposed by 

 H. Diels and one by W. Kranz.* J. G. Schneider, 

 too, in his edition of H.A. (1811) made some sugges- 

 tions for improving the text of G.A. based partly on 

 the Latin versions, but most of his work is superseded 

 by Bekker's edition. Some passages are also dis- 

 cussed by J. Zahlfleisch.^ 



" Aristot. Studien (1866), IV. 363, 378, 413. 



" J. of Philology, XXXIV (1918), 254. 



* Emendationes Aristoteleae, in Neue Jahrbiichfir f. Philol. 

 u. Padagog. CXIX (1879), 111, 



^ Phil, der Gr. II. 2^ 569-570\ 



' Die Fragmente der Vorsokratiker (5th edn., ed. Kranz, 

 1934-1937). 



f Philologus, LUl (1894), 39-44. 



