Table No. 6. Early Amber, Kansas. 



Number of experiments, - 

 Percentage of practical sugar, - - 



Table No. 1. Black Top, South Carolina. 



Number of experiments, - 211 



Percentage of practical sugar, - 5 8 9 I 10 



Table No 8 African, Kentucky. 



Number of experiments, - I 3 I i I 2 I i 3 



Percentage of practical sugar, - 06789 



Table No. 9 . WJiite Mammoth, Missouri. 



Total, 12. 



AVERAGES, 



Total, ii. 



AVERAGE?. 



Number of experiments, - 21121 



Percentage of practical sugar, I 4 I 5 I 7 I 10 



Table No. W.Onmseea-na, Ohio. 



Number of experiments, 



Percentage of practical sugar, 



Table No. \\.-Rfgular Sorghum. Ohio. 

 Number of experiments, - 2 



Percentage of practical sugar, 



Table No. VI. Hybrid, Tennessee. 

 Number of experiments, - 



Percentage of practical sugar, 







Total, ii. 



AVERAGES. 



I Total, n. 



| AVERAGE?. 



I Total, 12. 



| AVERAGES. 



I Total, "ii. 



I AVERAGES. 



Total, ii. 



AVERAGES. 



lab'e No. 13 Sugar Cane, Iowa. 



Number of experiments, - 413 



Percentage of practical sugar, - -- I I 8 I 10 I I 



Tablr. No. 14. Ooomseeana, South Carolina. 



Total, 10. 



AVERAGES, 



Number of experiments, 



Percentage of practical sugar, - 5 



I i 3 i Total, 10. 



AVERAGES. 



T'ible No. \5.Neeasana,Ohio. 



Number of experiments, - 4 



Percentage of practical sugar, - 



I Total, 10. 



I AVERAGE4. 



21 



