Table No. 16. Goose Neck, Missouri. 



Number of experiments, - I 4 I i 



Percentage of practical sugar, - 06 



Table No. 17. Early Orange, Hfissouri. 

 Number of experiments, --- 42112 



i Total, 12. 



Percentage of practical sugar, - 67 



9 10 



Table No. \8.Neeasana, Ohio. 



Number of experiments, - 4124 



Percentage of practical sugar, - 0479 



Table No. 19. New Variety, Tennessee. 



Number of experiments, 

 Percentage of practical sugar, 



9 I0 



Table No. 20. Chimera, Virginia. 



Number of experiments, -.- 21211 



Percentage of practical sugar, - I I i I 5 I 7 I 8 



Table No. 21. Wolf Tail, Tennessee. 

 Number of experiments, -- 21111 



Percentage of practical sugar, - I 5 6 



Table No. 22. Gray Top, Tennessee. 



Number of experiments, - I 2 I 3 I i I i I 2 



Percentage of practical sugar, - 64789 



Table No. 2S.Liberian, Ohio. 



AVERAGES. 



Total, 12. 



AVERAGES. 



Total, 12. 



AVERAGES, 



i Total, 10. 



" | AVERAGES. 



3 Total, 10. 



9 | AVERAGES, 



3 | Total, 9. 



10 I AVERAGES. 



Total, ii. 



AVERAGES. 



Number ol experiments, - I 2 I i I i 



Percentage of practical sugar, - | 3 I 4 & I 9 | 



lableNo. 24.Liberian. Ohio. 



Number of experiments, 



I'M 



Total, ii. 



AVERAGES. 



Total, ii. 



Percentage of practical sugar, 02| 34|68J9 AVERAGE 5- 



22 



