Table No. 25 Oomseeana, Tennessee. 



Number of experiments, 



Total, 10. 



Percentage of practical sugar, 023589 



10 AVERAGES, 



Table No. 26 Sumac, Alabama. 

 Number of experiments, 2111 

 Percent, of pract'l sugar, I I 3 I 4 I 5 I 



211 Total, 10. 



9 10 



AVERAGES. 



Table No. 27. Mastadon, South Carolina. 



Number of experiments, 

 Percentage of practical sugar, 



Table No. '28Imphee, South Carolina. 



Number of experiments, 2Tii2|i|i 

 Percent, of pract'l sugar, 0|2J3478|9 



Table No. 29. New Variety. 



Total, 10. 



AVERAGES. 



Total, ii. 



AVERAGES, 



Number of experiments, 3111112 

 Percent, of pract'l sugar, 01245! 



Table No. 30. Sumac, Alabama. 



Number of experiments, 

 Percentage of practical sugar, 



6 8 10 



Total, ii. 



AVERAGE 4, 



Total, ii. 



AVERAGES, 



Total, 12. 



AVERAGE 1, 



Table No. 3U Honduras, District of Columbia. 

 Number of experiments, - 61122 



Percentage of practical sugar, - . i | 3 4 5 



Tab^e No 32. Honey Cane, Louisiana. 



Number of experiments, - 412122 Total, 12. 



Percentage of practical sugar, - | 2 3 6 57 AVERAGES. 



Table No. ZZ.Sprangle Top, Alabama. 



Number of experiments, - 411141 Total, 12. 



Percentage of practical sugar, - I i I 2 4 5 rt I AVERAGE 2, 



