READING LIST 457 



zation, Bateson, 1902; Mendel's Versuchc iiber Pflanzcnhybridcn, two 

 papers (1865 and i86g), edited by Tschermak, 1901; Ann. Rept. Smithson. 

 Inst., 1901-1902; Pop. Sci. Mo., vol. 62, 1903; vol. 63, 1904; Science, vol. 

 23, 1903. Galton: Pop. Sci. Mo., vol. 29, 1886; Nature, vol. 70, 1907; 

 Galton's Natural Inheritance, 1889. Weismann: Brief Autobiograjjhy, 

 with portrait, in The Lamp, vol. 26, 1903; Solomonsen, Bcricht iiber die 

 Feier des 70 Geburtstages von August Weismann, 1904; Weismann's The 

 Germ -Plasm, 1893, and The Evolution Theory, 1904. 



CHAPTER XV 



History of Geology and Paleontology, Zittel, 1901. The Founders of 

 Geology, Geikie, 2d edition, 1905. History and Methods of Paleonto- 

 logical Discovery, Marsh, Proceed. Am. Adv. Sci., 1879. Same article in 

 Pop. Sci. Mo., vol. 16, 1879-1880. The Rise and Progress of Paleontology, 

 Huxley, Pop. Sci. Mo., vol. 20, 1882. Lyell: Charles Lyell and Modern 

 Geology, Bonney, 1895; Sketch in Pop. Sci. Mo., vol. I, 1872, also vol. 

 20, 1881-1882. Owen: Life of, by his grandson, 2 vols., 1894; See also 

 above under Chapter VH. Agassiz: Life and Correspondence, by his 

 wife, 2 vols., 1885; Life, letters and works, Marcou, 2 vols., 1896; What 

 we Owe to Agassiz, Wilder, Pop. Sci. Mo., July, 1907; Agassiz at Penikese, 

 Am. Nat., 1898. Cope: A Great Naturahst, Osborn in The Century, 1897; 

 See above, under Chapter VII, for further references. MARSH : Pop. Sci. Mo., 

 vol. 13, 1878; Sketches of, Nature, vol. 59, 1898-99; Science, vol. 9, 1899; 

 Am. J. Sci., vol. 157, 1899. Zittel: Biographical Sketch with portrait, 

 Schuchert, Ann. Rept. Smithson. Inst., 1903-1904. Osborn, Papers on 

 Paleontological Discovery in Science from 1899 onward. The FavOm 

 Expedition of the Am. Museum of Nat. History, Science, March 29, 1907. 



Note. Since the four succeeding chapters deal with the Evolution 

 Theory, it maybe worth while to make a few general comments on the liter- 

 ature pertaining to Organic Evolution. The number of books and articles 

 is very extensive, and I have undertaken to sift from the great number a 

 limited list of the more meritorious. Owing to the prevalent vagueness 

 regarding evolution theories, one is likely to read only about Darwin and 

 Darwinism. This should be avoided by reading as a minimum some good 

 reference on Lamarck, Weismann, and De Vries, as well as on Darwin. 

 It is well enough to begin with Darwin's Theon,', but it is not best to lake 

 his Origin of Species as the first book. To do this is to place oneself fifty 

 years in the past. The evidences of Organic Evolution have greatly multi- 

 plied since 1859, and a better conception of Darwin's Theory can be ob- 

 tained by reading first Romanes's Darwin and After Darwin, vol. 1. This to 

 be followed by Wallace's Darwinism, and, thereafter, the Origin of Species 



