REPORT OF THE FISH AND GAME COMMISSION. 



55 



first place in both quantity of catch and value of its fishery products. 

 Only six years ago slie lidd a place of insignificance among the states 

 in value of her fisheries. 



1919 Pounds 



Sardine lo.'S.SSo.uou 



All Fish 2«a,2l>0,000 



1918 



Sardine 157.650.000 



All Fish 259.100.000 



1917 



Sardine lOl.inn.nnn 



All Fish 211.500,000 



1916 



Sardine 15.R50.00n 



AU ITsh 93.530.000 



Sardine 



Salmon 



Alhacore 

 and Tuna 



E33 



AU Others 



1919 Pounds 



Sulinoii 1."!. 150,000 



Alb. & Tuna 31,140,000 

 All others.. 64,100,000 



1918 



.Salmon 13.030.000 



All.. & Tuna 13.500.000 

 All others.. 71,U20,000 



1917 



Salmon 11,010.000 



Alb. & Tuna 30.560.000 

 All others.. 65.830,000 



1916 



Salmon 10,840.000 



Alb. & Tuna 22.900.000 

 All others.. 44,200,000 



Fig. 13. The growth of the sardine fishery. 

 Quantities landed as compared to those for 

 other species. 



MONTEREY 



SAN PEDRO 



SAN DIEGO 



1916 Pounds 

 Monterey .10.459,029 

 San Pedro. 2,592,370 

 San Diego. 2,551.026 



1917 Pounds 

 Monterey .41,621,150 

 San Pedro.52, 615,300 

 San Diego. 9.718,336 



1918 Pounds 

 Monterey .64.915,002 

 San Pedro.78.077.612 

 San Dlego.l3.207,2G5 



1919 Pounds 

 Monterey .81,447,280 

 San Pedro.54.G00,194 

 San Diego.11,183,539 



Fig. 14, Sardines landed at Monterey, San Pedro and San Diego. 



SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA 

 NORTHERN CALIFORNIA 



1916 



Southern .. 552.609 

 Northern — 196,104 



1917 



Southern ..1,538.122 

 Northern „ 480,111 



1918 1919 



Southern -.1,385,202 Southern ..1,166,435 

 Northern — 729,100 Northern .. 905,206 



Fig. 15, Comparison of cases of fish of all kinds packed in northern 



and southern California. 



