340 THE BIOLOGY OF THE FROG chap. 



a small red card which was moved near them. If a tuning 

 fork was sounded just before the card was presented, it 

 " became evident that the sound put the frog on the alert, 

 and, when the object came, into view, it jumped at it more 

 quickly and a greater number of times than when the visual 

 stimulus was given without the auditory. . . . When the red 

 card was shown, it was often several seconds before the frog 

 would notice it and attempt to get it, but when the sound 

 also was given, the animal usually noticed and jumped toward 

 the moving card almost immediately." It is probable that 

 this habit of getting into readiness for a spring upon hearing 

 a sound near by is of value to the frog, since insects and 

 other creatures that serve as food often manifest their pres- 

 ence by some sort of noise before they come into the frog's 

 field of vision. If the frog prepares himself, he is more apt 

 to seize his prey when it appears. 



REFERENCES 



Ach, N. Ueber die Otolithenfunction und den Labyrinthtonus. 

 Arch. ges. Phys., Bd. 86, 1901. 



Beer, T. Die Accommodation des Auges bei den Amphibien. Arch, 

 ges. Phys., Bd. 73, 1898. 



Girard, H. Recherches sur la fonction des canaux semi-circulaires 

 de roreille interne chez la grenouille. Arch. Phys. Norm, et Path. (5), 

 T. 4, 1892. 



Goltz, F. Ueber die physiologische Bedeutung der Bogengange des 

 Ohrlabyrinths. Arch. ges. Phys., Bd. 2, 1870. Beitrage zur Lehre von 

 den Funktionen der Nervencentren des Frosches. Berlin, 1868. 



Hirschberg, J. Zur Vergleichenden Ophthalmoskopie. Arch. Anat. 

 u. Phys., phys. Abth., 1882. Zur Dioptrik und Ophthalmoskopie der 

 Fisch- und Amphibienaugen. I.e., 1882. 



Landois, H. Konnen Frosche horen ? 25 Jahresber. westfal. Prov. 

 Ver., 1S97. 



Laudenbach. Zur Otolithenfrage. Arch. ges. Phys., Bd. 77, 1899. 



Lyon, E. P. A Contribution to the Comparative Physiology of 

 Compensatory Motions. Am. Jour. Phys., Vol. 3, 1899. 



