BIBLIOGRAPHY 437 



assumed formidable proportions. Wassermann, Neisser, Bruck, and 

 Schucht, Zeit. f. Hyg., vol. lv., p. 451. Wassermann, Berl. Klin. Woch., 

 1907, p. 1599. Wassermann and Plaut, Deut. Med. Woch., 1906, p. 1769. 

 Wassermann and Meier, ibid., 1907, p. 1287. Neisser, Bruck, and Schucht, 

 Deut. Med. Woch., 1906, p. 1937. Bruck and Stern, ibid., 1908, p. 401. 

 Schutze, Berlin Klin. Woch., 1907, p. 126. Levaditi and Marie, Comptes 

 Rendus Soc. Biol., vol. Ixii., p. 872. Levaditi and Yamanouchi, ibid., 

 vol. Ixiii., p. 740, and vol. Ixiv., pp. 275, 349, and 720. Marie, Levaditi, 

 and Yamanouchi, ibid., p. 169. Citron, Berlin. Klin. Woch., 1907, p. 1370. 

 Michaelis, ibid. Meier, ibid., p. 1636. Weil and Braun, Berlin. Klin. 

 Woch., 1907, p. 1570, and Wien. Klin. Woch., 1908, p. 151. Klausner, 

 Wien. Klin. Woch., 1908, p. 214. Landsteiner, Miller and, Potzl, Wien. 

 Klin. Woch., 1907. Forges and Meier, Berlin. Klin. Woch., 1908, p. 731. 

 Elias, Neubauer, Forges, and Salmon, Wien. Klin. Woch., 1908, p. 748. 

 Simplified forms of technique are given by Noguchi, Journ. Exp. Med., 

 1909, p. 392, and Caulfeild, Journ. Med. Res., 1908, p. 507. 



Rabies. An excellent account of modern views on the immunity to 

 rabies is given by Marie, Bull. Inst. Past., vol. vi., 1908, pp. 705 and 753. 



See also Schneder, Zeit. f. Hyg., vol. xlii., p. 362. Remlinger, Bull. 

 Inst. Past., vol. ii., pp. 753 and 792. 



