EEEATA AND ADDENDA. 



Page 2, No. 15. The specific name of Leptosia Lathyri was first proposed by Hiibner in 

 his Verzeicbniss for the misnamed Papilio Sinapis, Linn. The insect called by 

 the former name by modern French writers, is a distinct species. 



11, Nos. 2, 3, and 4, according 1 to a note received from Mr. Henry Doubleday, belong- to 

 Anthrocera Trifolii. The true A. Lonicerse, distinguished by its long-, slender 

 antennse, and very narrow border to the posterior wings, is not figured. In this 

 species the spots are seldom, if ever, confluent ; whereas, in A. Trifolii, the great 

 majority of the specimens have them so, more or less. 



Whilst this Edition has been going through the press, a very distinct species, 

 A. Minos, has been taken plentifully in Galway. 



12. Reverse the numbers of Smerinthus Populi, (which should be fig. 9); and Tilise, 

 which should be fig. 8. 



22, No. 49, after Castrensis, add, M. & F. 



27, No. 81. Mr. Henry Doubleday informs me this is Psyche intermediella of Bruand. 



Nos. 82, 83, 84, and 85. According to the same gentleman, these figures appear to be 

 one species, Ps. pulla, of Esper, P. pullella, of Bruand's Monograph. The female of 

 this species is vermiform, and widely differs from the same sex of intermediella, 

 which has perfect legs and antennse. The small size and indistinct characters cf 

 these four figures render their specific determination impossible. 



31, No. 111. This figure represents a variety of Triphsena orbona, No. 110. The true sub- 

 sequa, which is found in the New Forest, is very distinct, and has never been 

 figured in this country. 



32, No. 119. This represents the type of Lytaea agathina, and fig. 1661, (PI. 52), a 

 variety of it. 



34, No. 134. This is the female of Agrotis puta. 



36, No. 149. Agrotis subgothica, according to Mr. Henry Doubleday, is an American 

 species. 



37, No. 155. This is a variety of sp. 156, according to Mr. H. Doubleday. 

 42, No. 189. This is the male of Myth, lythargyria, and fig. 190, the female. 

 No. 192, for quereus, read quercus. 



43, No. 193. Mr. H. Doubleday considers this as a variety of the preceding, Meristis 

 quercus. 



44, No. 204. Mr. H. Doubleday considers this to be a variety of Caradr. cubicularis, 



45, No. 211. This, according to Mr. H. Doubleday, is the Orrh. spadicea, W. V., Hb., &c. 

 (not our No. 210.) 



48, No. 229. This figure represents the type of Xylophasia rurea, of which a variety is 

 gi ven in fig. 230. Mr. H. Doubleday has reared both varieties from the same broods 

 of larvse. 



No. 231, after Hepatica, dele the v. 



61, No. 321. This figure, according to Mr. H. Doubleday, represents Acr. Rumicis, of 

 which another figure is given in fig. 319. 



66, No. 356, 357, 358. Mr. H. Doubleday considers these three figures as representing only 

 one species, Non. lutosa, of Hiibner, of which a specimen from Mr. Curtis' cabinet is 

 represented in fig. 1 668, (pi. 52.) 



The true N. cannae is represented in our Supplemental fig. 1712. 

 68, No. 373, for Gemini punctata, read Gemini puncta. 



68, No. 375, is given under the name of Calamia Phragmitidis, bv Mr. Stephens, in Cat. 

 Lep. Br. Mus. f. 138. 



70, No. 889. This is the type and not a variety of Cucullia Gnaphalii, and add as a 

 synonym, Cucullia Solidaginis, Steph. Trans. Ent. Soc. ii. pi. 3,f. 7. 



^ 



