Index to N. P. Angelin's Palseontologia Scandinavica, with notes 13 



Notes 



The name Cyclognathus, a synonyme of Acerocare and proposed by LINNAESSON 1875, p. 500, ought to be 



dropped; compare MOBEKG and MOLLEB 1898, p. 230. 

 Compare MOBEEG and MOLLEE 1898, p. 231. 



Not identical with A. Barrandei FLETCHEE et SALTEE. Compare LINDSTEOM 1885, p. 53. 



See Trapelocera bicuspis. 



See Trapelocera? breviloba. 



See A. granulata. 



As to the hypostoma compare LINDSTBOM 1901, pi. 1, fig. 3. 



See Cyrtometopus? decacanthus. 



According to LINNARSSON (1869, p. 65) identical with A. centrina. 



Compare LINDSTEOM 1885, p. 54. See also the following species. 



According to LINDSTEOM 1885, p. 54, identical with A. Marklini. 



See Aneuacanthus. In an abstract of Palseontologia Svecica in Neues Jahrbuch fur Mineralogie etc, 1852, 

 p. 242, was remarked that two genera Eryx and Aconthius previously existed among the serpents. 

 Surely for this reason ANGELIN in his >Addenda et Corrigenda* amended Eryx to Elyx and 

 Aconthias to Aneucanthus (by BAREANDE 1856, p. 20, corrected to Aneuacanthus). 



See under Solenopleura. 



By misprint recorded from regio E instead of regio D. Compare LINNAESSON 1869, p. 83, foot-note 2. 

 See Corynexochus? umbonatus. 



By ANGELIN himself, p. IV, changed into Aneucanthus. See this. 



Compare TTJLLBEEG 1880, p. 23. 



According to TULLBEEG 1880, p. 28, a mistake must have been made by ANGELIN in the reproduction of 

 the two species A. glandiformis and A. bituberculatus (plate VI, figs 1, 2): the head of ANGELIN'S 

 fig. 1 and the tail of his fig. 2 belong to A. bituberculatus, the head of fig 2 and the tail of fig. 1 

 to A. glandiformis. - - In the same paper TULLBEEG states that the specimen from Krekling in 

 Norway described by BEOGGEB 1878, p. 75, under the name A. bituberculatus is not identical with 

 this species but with A. cfr loevigatus DALM. 



Compare TULLBEEG 1880, p. 35. 



TULLBEEG, who examined the specimens on which ANGELIN based this species, stated (1880, p. 22) that 

 the tail of the figured specimen is in reality the head of another species, described by BBOGGEE 

 1878, p. 68, under the name A. Nathorsti. Only the head is known. Compare also WALLEEIUS 

 1895, p. 37, and GEONWALL 1902, p. 53. 



ANGELIN records this species from regio D which probably ought to be C. Compare TOENQUIST 1884, 

 p. 90, and WIMAN 1905, p. 12. 



