58 



Law Cases in District 2 



United States v. E. W. Bever : On September 8, 1914, in the United 

 States district court at Montrose, Colo., defendant pleaded guilty to in- 

 formation charging him with grazing sheep on the Montezuma National 

 Forest without a permit, and was sentenced to pay a fine of $10 and 

 costs. 



United States v. J. H. Cole and Win. Noble : Grazing trespass, Routt 

 National Forest. Settled by payment of $106.25. 



United States v. Steve Mark et al. : Fire trespass, Harney National 

 Forest. During the September term of court at Deadwood, S. Dak., 

 defendants, indicted for leaving a fire unattended on the Harney Na- 

 tional Forest, failed to appear, forfeiting their bonds. 

 Law Cases in District 3 



United States v. R. F. Keene : Grazing trespass, Gila National Forest. 

 Decree entered August 8, 1914, enjoining Keene from further grazing 

 stock on the forest and providing for the recovery of $25 damages and 

 the costs, amounting to $83.25. Amount of damages and costs paid 

 August 9, 1914. 



Unitejd States v. F. E. Sanchez : Grazing trespass, Lincoln National 

 Forest. Defendant held for grand jury under $500 bond. 



United States v. J. W. Marley & Sons : Grazing trespass, Coconino 

 National Forest. Judgment for $450 satisfied July 30, 1914. 

 Law Cases in District 6 



The Sparta Irrigation Co. brought an action to restrain the super- 

 visor of the Minam National Forest and two other defendants from 

 interfering with its ditch, which it apparently had abandoned for a 

 time, but has resumed use. Damages amounting to $5,000 were also 

 asked. After a conference between the attorney and president of the 

 plaintiff company and the assistant to the solicitor and United States 

 attorney the company was persuaded to drop its action against the 

 supervisor. This was done upon motion of plaintiff's attorney in open 

 court. 



LANDS. 



Numbering Supplemental Lists, 



The instructions by letter of August 3, " L, Service Settlement, List 

 Numbers," have been misinterpreted in some instances. They should be 

 understood as follows : 



When submitting supplemental lists which describe ~by legal sub- 

 divisions areas to be listed, parts of which areas have already been 

 listed and described by metes and bounds, and which must therefore be 

 excepted from the total area of the new list, the supplemental list 

 should be given a new number and the net acreage thereby listed should 

 be stated. Reference should be made in the body of the letter to the 



