INDEX OF CASES CITED. 



xli 



Daw V. Hole, 15 Law J. (N. S.) Q. B., 32 



—353 

 Dawes v. Hawkins, 29 L. J. C. P., 343— 



101 

 Dawson v. Alford, Dyer, 312—286, 287 

 v. Cropp, 1 G. i>., !'61; 3 D. & L., 



225—302 



V. Charaney, 5 Q. B., 154—601 



. V. CoUis, 10 C. B., 523—484 



_ V, Fitzgerald, 9 L. R., Ex., 7—391 



.V. Linton, 5 B. & AL, 521; 1 D. 



& R., 117—439 

 r. Midland Railway Co., 8 L. R., 



Ex. 8-140 

 Dayrell v. Hoare, 12 Ad. & E., 356—384 

 Deane V. Allalley, 3 Esp., 11—455 



V. Clayton, 7 Taun., 419—389 



V. Keat, 3 Camp., 4 — 575 



Dearden v. Evans, 5 M. & W., 11 ; 2 H. & 



H., 7—110 

 Degg (Adx. ) V. Midland Counties Railway, 



1 H. & N., 773—211, 217, 218 

 Degge V. Tiicker, 1 H. & N., 500—601 

 Delaney v. Fox, 26 Law J. (N. S.) C. B., 



248—357, 437 

 Delapole r. Delapole, 17 Ves., 150—126 

 Denby v. ]\loore, 1 B. & AL, 123—440, 



441 

 Dendy v. Niclwl, 27 L. J. (N. S.) C. P., 



220—288, 451 



V. Simpson, 18 C. B., 831—346 



Denneu Light, 26 Law J. (N. S.) Ch., 



469—90 

 Dennis v. Lofft, Weekly Reporter, Feb. 5, 



1859—430 

 Dent Cummutation [In re), 8 Q. B., 43 — 



400 

 Denton v. Richmond, 1 C. & M., 734 ; 3 



Tyr., 630-313 

 Derby (Earl) v. Gee & Others— 169 

 Daring (Ex, 2Mrte), 1 De Gex B. C, 398 



—524* 

 Dickinson v. Follett, 1 Moo. & R., 299— 



570 

 i\ Gappi (cited 1 M. & Scott, 78; 



and 5 C. & P., 81)— 553 

 V. Grand Junction Railway Com- 

 pany, 7 Ex., 282—174, 177, 178, 186 

 Digby V. Atkinson, 4 Camp., 275 — 451 

 V. West Ham Board of Health, 



Weekly Reporter, May 1, 1858—602 

 Dimech v. Corlett, 33 Law Times, 21 — 



478 

 Dingle v. Hare, 29 L. J. (N. S.) C. P., 148 



—527 



Dixon r. Geldard, A. D., 1857— IIS 

 Dobson V. Collis, 1 H. & N., 81—203 

 Doe dem. Asliuz'. Sumraersett, 1 15. & Ad., 



135—432 



Baker v. Coombes, 9C. B., 714 — 345 



Barrett v. Kemp, 2 Scott, 9 ; 2 Bing. , 



N. C, 102—170 

 Bennett v. Turner, 7 M. & W., 226 — 



346 



Bevis, 7 C. B., 456—482 



Bloomfield v. Smith, 6 East, 520— 



435 



Cates V. Somervilc, 9 D. & R., 100— 



435 

 Daggett V. Snowdon, 2 W. Bl., 1224 



— 433 



Davenish r. Moffatt, 15 Q. B., 257— 



413 

 Davenport v. Rhodes, 11 M. & W., 



COO ; 1 D. & L., 292—433 



Dixon ('. Roe, 7 C. B., 134—304 



Douglas V. Lock, 2 Ad. & E., 705 ; 



4 N. & M., 807—90, 109, 384, 443 



Hall V. Benson, 4 B. &AL, 588—432 



Hertford (Marquis of) v. Hunt, 1 M. 



& W., 690 ; 2 Gale, 102—423 

 V. Hopkinson, 3D. & R. , 



507—432 



• Jones V. Crouch, 2 Camp., 448—122 



Jordan v. Ward — 435 



Kirby ?;. Carter, 1 Ry. & Moo., 237 



— 435 



• Kindersley v. Hughes, 7 M. & W., 



130—432, 433 



Lewis V. Rees, 6 C. & P., 610—169 



Macartney (Earl) r. Crick, 5 Esp., 



196—432 

 Mann v. Walters, 10 B. & C, 626 ; 



5 M. &Ry.,357— 432 



Manvers (Earl) r. Mizem, 2 Moo. & 



R., 56—420, 432 

 Marlow r. W^iggins, 4 Q. B., 367 ; 3 



G. & D., 504—417 



Marsack v. Read, 12 East, 57—432 



Morgan v. Powell, 7 M. & G., 980— 



410 

 Monkv. Geeckie, 1 C. & K., 307— 



290, 412 

 Murrell v. Mil ward, 3 M. & W., 328 



—434 

 Oldershaw v. Breach, 6 Esp., 106^ 



435 

 Philips V. Benjamin, 9 Ad. & E., 



644—410 

 Pitt V. Laming, 4 Camp., 73 — 314 



