INDEX OF CASES CITED. 



xlv 



Gregory V. Gregory, (G. Cooper, 201 ;) S.C, 



Jacob, 631—112 

 V. West Midland Rail. Co., 3-3 



L. J. (N. S.)Ex. 155—254 

 V. Piper, 9 B. & C, 591 ; 9 M. 



& R., 500-212 

 V. Wilson — 471 



Gregg V. Coates, 23 Beav., 33—429 

 Griffith V. Young, 12 East, 513—61, 63, 66 

 Griffiths V. Chichester, 7 Ex., 95—278 

 V. Hatchard, 1 K. & John. 17 — 



478 

 V. PuIestoD, 13 M. &W., 358— 



321 



V. Tombs, 7 C. & P., 810—322 



Griflfenhoofe r. Danbuz, 4 E. & B., 230 ; 



3 C. L. R., 91 ; 5 E. &B., 746—395 

 Grimoldby v. Wells — 485 

 Grimwood r. Moss, 7 L. R. C. P., 360— 



305 

 Grinstead v. Marlowe, 4 T. K. 717 — 78 

 (Trove V. West, 7 Taun., 39—143 

 Gruhb V. Brown, Weekly Reporter, Nov. 13, 



1858—346 

 Gulliver v. Cosens, 1 C. B. 788—272, 273 

 Gundry v. Feltham, 1 T. R. , 334—365 

 Gurr r. Scudds, 11 Ex., 190—260, 505 

 Guy V. West, 2 Selw., N. P., 1287—131 

 Gudgeon r. Bessett, 26 L. J. (N. S.), Q. B., 



36—448 

 Gnibb V. Inclosure Commissioners — 1 05 



H. 



Hackett v. Overseers of Long Bevington — 



408 

 Hadley v. Baxeudale, 9 Ex., 341 — 509, 



510, 511, 514, 533, 534 

 Haigh V. London and North Western Rail- 

 way Company, 1 F. & F., 646—152 

 Haldane v. Johnson, 1 C. L. R., 672 — 



426 

 Hale V. Oldroyd, 14 M. & W., 789—170 

 Hall V. City of London Brewery Company, 



31 L. J. (i\.S), Q. B., 257—463 

 V. Feamley, 3 Q. B., 919 ; 3 G. & 



D., 10—351 

 V. Knox, 33 L. J. (N. S.), M. C. 1 — 



376 

 V. North Eastern Railway Company, 



10 L. R. Q. B., 437—253 

 V. Rogerson, Olliphant's Law of 



Horses, 56—569 

 V. Smith [Swift], 6 Scott, 167—171 



Hallen v. Runder, 3 Tyr., 959 ; 1 C. AL .S: 



R., 266-66 

 Hallifax v. Chambers, 7 Dow., 342 ; 4 M. 



& W., 662 ; 1 H. & H., 417—306 

 Halliwell v. Phillips, Jurist, July 10, 1858 



— 126 

 Hamer & Straj^an v. Kuowles — 101 

 Hamerton v. Stead, 3 B. & C, 478 ; 5 D. 



& R., 206-281, 412 

 Hamilton i\ Clanrlcardc (P]arl of), 1 Bro. 



P. C, 341—420 

 Hammack v. White, 30 L. J. (N. S. ) Ch. 



681—362 

 Hammersmith Rent Charge (In re), 4 Ex., 



87—280 

 Hammond (Ex parte), 1 De Gex, B. C, 



93—524 

 Hancock v. Southall, 4 D. & R. 202—603 

 Hannam v. Mockett, 4 D. & R. 518 ; 2 B. 



& C. 934—345, 385 

 Hanks v. Palling, 6 E. & B., 659-479 

 Hanson v. Armitage, 5 B. & Al., 557—495, 



496, 500, 503 

 Harcoiu-t y. WTiite, 30 L. J. (N. S.), Ch. 



681 ; 6 Jurist, 1087—112 

 Hardcastle v. Shafto, 1 Anst., 184—312 

 r. South Yorkshire Railway 



Company, 28 L. J. (N. S.) Ex., 139— 



350 

 V. Soutli Yorkshire and River 



Don Company, 4 H. & N. 67—138 

 Harden v. Hesketh, 28 L. J. (N. S.), Ex., 



137—448, 469 

 Harman v. Reeve, 25 Law J. (N. S.) C. P. 



257 ; 18 C. B. 587—505, 587, 588 

 Harmer i\ Cornelius, 28 L.J. (N. S.), C. P., 



85—202 

 Harpers. Charles worth, 4 B. & C, 574 ; 



6 D. &R., 572-91 

 Harris v. Hoskins, 34 L^ J. (N. S.), M. C. 



145 — 376 



r. Mantle, 3 T. R., 306—307 



V. Ryding, 5 M. & W., 60-81 



Harrison v. Barnby, 5 T. R. , 246 — 289 

 V. London, Brighton and South 



Coast Railway Company, 31 L. J. 



(N. S.^„ Q. B. 113—251 

 Hart V. Prendergast, 14 M. & W., 741 — 509 



V. Sattley, 3 Camp., 523—503 



V. Windsor, 12 M. & W., 68—425 



Hartley!;. Burkitt, 4 Bing. N. C, 687—316 

 • ■ V. Harriman, 1 B. & AL, 620 ; 



Holt, 617 ; 2 Stark., 212—157, 158,' 



160 

 Harvey v. Bridges— 378 



