INDEX OF CASES CITED. 



xlix 



Langford v. Selmes, 3 K. & Jobn, 220 — 



418 

 Langhton v. Iliggins, 4 11. & N., 402— 



536 

 Large v. Pitt, Peake's Add. Cases^ 152 — 



88, 90 

 Latham v. Atwood, Cro. Car., 515 — 442 

 Lathbury v. Earle, 27 Veterinarian, 548 — 



603, 605 

 Lathropp v. Marsliam, 5 Ves., 259—310 

 Lattimore n Grairard, 1 Ex., 809 — 333 

 Last V. Dinn, 28 L. J. (N. S.) Ex., 94 — 



452 

 Laugher v. Pointer, 5 B. & C, 517—228 

 Lawrance v. Faux, 2 F. & F., 435—470 

 Lawrence r. Aberdien, 5 B. & AL, 107 — 



231, 232 

 V. Jenkins, 8 L. R. Q. B., 274 



—139 



144 



V. King, 3 L. R. Q. B., 345— 



■ — V. Tolleshunt Knights, 31 L. J. 



(N. S.) M. C, 148—508 

 Lawson v. Langley, 4 Ad. & E., 890—84 

 Lawton v. Lavvton, 3 Atk., 13 — 455 

 Layton v. Hurry, 8 Q. B., 811 — 270 

 Leach v. Thomas, 7 G. & P., 327 ; 2 M. & 



W., 427-307, 428, 460 

 Leader v. Homewood, 27 L. J. (N. S.) C. 



P., 316—459 

 Leake's (Sir F. ) Case, Dyer, 365 ; 1 Sauu. , 



206—135 

 Leame v. Bray, 3 East, 593 ; 5 E.sp., 18 — 



155 

 Learson v. Robinson, 2 F. & F., 351—471 

 Leath v. Vine, 30 L. J. M. C, 207—377 

 Lee V. Riley, 34 L. J. (N. S.) C. P. 212— 



140 



V. Risdon, Taun., 189-69 



V. Unwin, 263 



V. Bayes and Robinson, 18 C. B., 599 



—697 

 V. Cooke (in Error), 28 L. J. (N. S.) 



Ex., 337—302 



V. Muggeridge, 5 Taun., 36 — 64 



V. Stephenson, 27 L. J. (N. S.) Q. B., 



263—74 

 Leeds v. Burrows, 12 East, 1 — 332 



V. Chectham, 1 Sim., 146 — 429 



Legg V. Pardoe, 30 L. J. (N. S.) M. C, 



108-381 

 Legh V. Hewitt, 4 East, 154—315 

 Leigh V. Patcrson, 2 Moore, 588 - 492, 493 



V. Heald, 1 B. & Ad., 622-109 



Lemayne v, Stanley — 535 



Lethbridge f . Lethbridge, 31 L. J. (N S.) 



Ch., 737—463 

 Letticc V. Judkin.s, 9 L. J. (N. S.) Ex., 



142—229 

 Lewis V. Bond — 471 

 V. Cosgrave, 2 Taun., 2—558 



V. Harris, 1 H. Bl., 7 n-290 



r. Peake, 7 Taun., 152—558 



V. Read, 13 M. & W., 834—278 



V. Rogers, 1 C. M. & R., 48 — 523 



Lexington v. Clark, 2 Vent., 223^277 

 Ley V. Peter, 27 L. J. (N. S.) Ex., 239— 



422 

 Liddard v. Kain, 2 Bing., 183 ; 9 Moore, 



356—563 

 Lidstor v. Barrow, 9 Ad. k Ell., 654 — 



368 

 Liebenrood v. Vines, 1 Meriv., 15—312 

 Li ford's Case, 11 Rep., 51 6—109, 127 

 Liggins V. Inge, 5 M. & P., 712 ; 7 Biug., 



682-73, 172, 174 

 Lilley V. Elwin, 11 Q. B., 742—200, 202 

 Lillie V. Legh — 471 

 Liudon r. Hooper, Cowp., 414—272, 273, 



274 

 — — V. Collins, Wille.s, 429-280 

 Line 2'. Stephenson, 5 Bing. (N. C), 183 — 



411 

 Limijus V. Gen. Omnibus Co., 32 L. J. 



Ex., 34—218 

 Lindsay v. Leigh, 11 Q. B., 455—201 

 Lisburne (Earl) v. Davids, 1 L. R. C. P., 



259—346 

 Littlefield v. Shee, 2 B. & Ad., 811—64 

 Livington v. Ralli, 3 C. L. R., 1096 — 



490 

 Llandaff v. Lyndon, 30 L. J. (N. S.), 



C. P. M. C, 192-526 

 Lloyd V. Da vies, 2 Ex., 103-411 



V. Walkey, 9 C. & P., 771-602 



V. Winton, 2 Wils., 28—280 



Lochv. Matthews, W. R., Feb. 14, 1863 



—463 

 Loder v. Kekule, 27 L. J. C. P., 27—511 



V. Bartlett, 31 L. J. (N. S.) Ex., 92 



—533 



Logan V. Lemusier, 6 Pr. C, 116—536 



London and North Western Railway Com- 

 pany (apijs.) V. Dunham (resp.), 18 

 C. B., 826-243 



London and Westminster Loan Cumiiany v. 

 Drake, 69 



Lonsdale (Eari of) v. Nelson, 2 B. & C, 

 311-114 



V. Rigg -379 



d 



